Search Results for "NSEIL Bye-laws"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "NSEIL Bye-laws"

26 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broking Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Contrary to Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality.

10 Jun 2013

The petitioner, Bombay Construction and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — Arbitrator's Refusal to Entertain Counterclaim Upheld as Within Jurisdiction. The court held that the arbitrator's decision to refrain from adjudicating the counterclaim regarding surplus in NSE capital market was within his jurisdiction and did not warrant interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Uttam Chand Garg, challenged an arbitral award dated 16th March 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator under the byelaws of the National Sto...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction in Stock Broker Dispute. Seat of Arbitration Determined by NSEIL Byelaws, Not by Agreement Clause.

3 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Kantilal Chhaganlal Securities Private Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 April 2010 passed by a panel of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator's Findings on Contract Notes and Liability Upheld as Not Patently Illegal.

24 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Kalyansinh K. Kumpavat, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Upholds Award as Not Suffering from Patent Illegality or Being Against Public Policy, Refusing to Reappreciate Evidence.

31 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Angel Capital & Debt Market Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 May 2009 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Mandatory Time Limit Under NSEIL Byelaws. Award passed beyond six-month period without extension provision is illegal and liable to be quashed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jul 2012

The Petitioner, a constituent, challenged an arbitral award dated 19 September 2009 passed by a panel of Arbitrators appointed under the Byelaws, Rule...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Due to Perverse Findings. Arbitrator's Failure to Consider Admitted Documents and Ledger Accounts Constitutes Patent Illegality Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Jun 2012

The petitioner, Shilpa Stock Broker Pvt. Ltd., a stock broker and member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSEIL) and Bombay Stock Exchang...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of the contract and byelaws was plausible and not perverse, and the award did not warrant interference.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Rajendra Kumar Bothra, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in NIFTY Trade Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that petitioners failed to prove unauthorized trade and that credit note was accepted without objection.

11 Feb 2010

The petitioners, Intex Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. and its director Dinesh Mehta, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Grounds Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Established. Court upholds award holding petitioner liable for unauthorized trades and failure to prove respondent's instructions.

4 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Sytematix Shares & Stocks (India) Ltd., a stockbroker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)