Search Results for "Mutual Fund"

254 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 254 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Mutual Fund Against Sales Tax Reassessment Orders — Holds Mutual Fund Not a Dealer Under MVAT Act, 2002. Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Beyond Limitation Period and Without Proper Sanction Are Invalid.

The petitioner, Axis Mutual Fund, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging several orders passed by the sales ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to SBI Mutual Fund Merger and Directs SEBI Impleadment to Assess Regulatory Compliance. Court Examines Maintainability Under Article 226 and the Validity of Merger Based on Prevailing NAV Without Investor Meeting in Light of SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996.

The Petitioner, appearing in person, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the merger of the SBI One India Fund with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against SEBI Order Declaring Art Funds as Collective Investment Schemes. Trusts managing pooled investments in art works held to be Collective Investment Schemes under SEBI Act, 1992, despite being structured as trusts rather than companies.

The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 19936 of 2017 challenging the order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal which had upheld SEBI's directio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Asset Management Company Tax Case — Notional Addition Based on SEBI Ceiling Not Permissible. Investment advisory fees actually charged, not the maximum permissible under SEBI regulations, constitute taxable income.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which upheld the CIT (A)'s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SPECIAL CASE NO. 3 OF 2001

The Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, presided over by Justice Roshan Dalvi, heard Special Case No. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Part on Mutuality Principle for Effluent Treatment Association. Interest on Bank Deposits Held Taxable as Income from Investments, Not Covered by Mutuality.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against a decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for ...