Search Results for "Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal"

331 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 331 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Reduces Compensation by 50% in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased Driver. Deceased's failure to place warning signs after tyre puncture on highway contributed to accident, leading to apportionment of liability under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of Sunil Samharu Yadav, who died in a road accident on 19.05.2013. The deceased w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Claimant in Motor Vehicle Accident Case on Territorial Jurisdiction Grounds. Territorial Jurisdiction Objection Overruled as Procedural Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Following Precedent in Malati Sardar v. National Insurance Company Ltd.

The appeal arose from a motor vehicle accident where the appellant's son died after being hit by a tractor driven recklessly by the first respondent. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Bus Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Owner Held Liable for Compensation Due to Invalid Permit and Route Violation. Concurrent findings of fact that vehicle was plied without valid permit and on unauthorized route upheld; no interference warranted.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, a 24-year-old Managing Director of a company, died in a collision with a bus owned by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Transport Authority in Motor Vehicles Act Case on Vehicle Replacement Rule. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rule 174(2)(c) Validated as It Does Not Exceed Section 83 and Serves Public Safety by Prohibiting Older Vehicle Replacements.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute concerning the validity of Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, which allows the tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Dog on Road Constitutes 'Act of God' Not Negligence. Claimant's Wife Died After Motorcycle Fell Due to Sudden Appearance of Dog; Tribunal Erred in Holding Claimant as Owner of Borrowed Vehicle Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Shri Vithal, filed a claim petition under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for the death of his wife ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Own Damage Claim Case Due to Lack of Jurisdiction of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. Claim for damage to insured vehicle is not maintainable under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as it is a contractual claim.

The case involves an appeal by the United India Insurance Company against an award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal at Aurangabad. The Tribunal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Directions to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals for Compliance with Procedural Rules. Court Holds That Insistence on Personal Appearance of Claimants at Filing Is Not Mandatory Under Rule 254(2) of Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Anil Prabhakar Tadkalkar, a practicing advocate, raising several issues concerning the disposal of claim ...