Search Results for "Mischief by fire"

7 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Mischief by Fire and Criminal Intimidation Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 436 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, original accused Nos.1 to 3, were convicted by the 4th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Beed in Sessions Case No.133/2002 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Arson Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 427 and 436 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Suyash Rajiv Mulukh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, for offences under Sections 427 (mischief causing damage)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Bank Manager and Co-accused in Branch Arson Case. Probation Benefit Denied for Offence Under Section 436 IPC as It Carries Life Imprisonment.

The case arises from an incident where the Poladpur branch of Mahad Co-Operative Urban Bank was set on fire on the night of 5th/6th September 1986. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Mischief by Fire Case Due to Material Contradictions and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 436 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dharam Kondiram Gumladu, was convicted under Section 436 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 by the Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for allegedl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Hut Burning Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Testimony. Conviction under Section 436 IPC for mischief by fire set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kishor Marotrao Raut, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Sessions Trial No. 7/2008 for an offence punisha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Acquittal in Crop Fire Case — Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Evidence of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Independent Witnesses Led to Acquittal Under Sections 436, 427, 504, 506 IPC.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by the original complainant, Shri Shripat Ramnath Sanap and his father Ramnath Krishna Sana...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part, Acquits Appellants of Rioting and Arson Charges Due to Lack of Evidence of Common Object. Conviction for House Trespass and Hurt Sustained Based on Testimony of Injured Witnesses.

The case arises from an incident on 10.9.1997 where a mob allegedly attacked the house of Sanjay Parode, whose son was arrested for a double murder. T...