Search Results for "Minors welfare"

141 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 141 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Custody to Father in International Child Custody Dispute -- High Court Order Set Aside -- Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 Applied with Welfare of Child as Paramount Consideration

The Supreme Court heard an appeal challenging the High Court judgment that set aside the Family Court order granting custody of two minor sons to thei...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition for Return of Minor Child to Netherlands. Dutch Mother's Custody Rights Upheld; Child's Habitual Residence Determined as Netherlands.

The petitioner, a Dutch national, filed a habeas corpus petition seeking the return of her minor daughter 'N' from the respondent father and his famil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition by Father Seeking Return of Minor Child to USA. Court holds that welfare of child is paramount and mere illegal removal from foreign jurisdiction does not automatically warrant return without considering child's best interests.

The petitioner, Abhinav Gyan Prasad, a US citizen residing in the USA, filed a habeas corpus petition in the Bombay High Court seeking the production ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Guardianship Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction — Family Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Guardianship of Person. Property Claims Cannot Be Adjudicated Independently in Guardianship Proceedings.

The petitioner, the father of two minors, filed a guardianship petition under Sections 6 and 11 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010159832015_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Family Court Order Disturbing Child Custody Based on Consent Without Welfare Inquiry. The court held that a custody order under Section 8 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 cannot be passed solely on consent without considering the welfare of the child.

The case involves an appeal by the father (Appellant 'A') against a Family Court order dated 15 July 2014 that disturbed the custody of his two minor ...