Search Results for "Minerals Concession Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Minerals Concession Rules"

82 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 82 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State to Enhance Royalty/Dead Rent in Mining Leases Despite Absence of Express Clause. Statutory Provisions Under Section 15(3) of MMDR Act and Rules 10 and 21 of Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964 Impliedly Authorize Enhancement During Subsistence of Lease.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court considered two civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Haryana against judgments of the Punjab and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Mining Company's Challenge to Stoppage Notice Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 — Two-Year Mining Period Expired. Lease Deed Executed on 18.04.2022 Permitted Mining for Maximum Two Years or Till Stage II Approval, Whichever Earlier; Court Held That the Stoppage Notice Was Valid and No Interference Warranted.

18 Feb 2025

The petitioner, M/S Minera Steel and Power Pvt. Ltd., a mining company, challenged a stoppage notice dated 08.04.2024 issued by the Deputy Conservator...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Explanations to Rule 38 of MCR, 2016 and Rule 45(8)(a) of MCDR, 2017 — Royalty Computation on Gross Sale Value Without Deduction of Royalty, DMF, and NMET Contributions is Valid. The Court held that royalty is a tax and not a contractual consideration, and the impugned explanations do not violate Article 14 or Article 265 of the Constitution.

15 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals by Cement Company Seeking Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquisition — Market Value Determined Based on Comparable Sales and Potential Use

7 Jul 2023

The appellant, M/s Bagalkot Cement & Industries Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, owned land in Bagalkot that was acquired b...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Condition Levying Royalty on Excavation of Earth for Reservoir Construction — Excavation of ordinary earth for construction of earthen dyke within leased land does not constitute 'mining' under MMDR Act, 1957.

4 Nov 2019

The petitioner, M/s. JSW Steel Limited, is an integrated steel plant that was allotted 629.92 acres of land by the Karnataka Industrial Area Developme...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Prohibit Export of Sand Under MMDR Act - Gujarat Rules Restricting Inter-State Sand Movement Held Valid. The Court held that the prohibition on export of sand was a reasonable restriction under Article 304(b) of the Constitution, aimed at preventing illegal mining and conserving natural resources.

1 Mar 2019

The case involves appeals by the State of Gujarat against the Gujarat High Court's judgment striking down Rules that prohibited the export of ordinary...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 as Ultra Vires Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act. Rule restricting transfer of mining leases to minerals not specified in First Schedule held inconsistent with parent Act.

1 Dec 2016

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the validity of Rule 8(1)(a) of the Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy M...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 by Mining Lessees. Rule requiring prior approval for transfer of mining leases for minerals not in First Schedule to MMDR Act held intra vires and not inconsistent with Section 10A(2)(c) of Amendment Act 2015.

1 Dec 2016

The petitioners, holders of mining leases for minerals not specified in the First Schedule to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Validity of Rule 5 of Goa Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2002 — Declares Quarry Lease Valid Despite Deletion of Chapter III. Rule 5, which deleted Chapter III of the Goa Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1985, is held intra vires Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, as the State Government has power to make rules for grant of quarry leases in respect of land belonging to private persons.

10 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Smt. Maria Teresa Philomena D'Rocha Pegado, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the constitutional v...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)