Search Results for "Metro Act 1978"

Trending :

Search Results for "Metro Act 1978"

48 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notice for Chennai Metro Station. Petitioner's challenge centered on whether CMRL's show cause notice under Section 3(2) of Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 was vitiated by post-decisional hearing after CMRL undertook before court in an earlier PIL to acquire the land.

11 Mar 2025

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by United India Insurance Company Limited, challenging a show cause notice ...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Plaintiff’s Suit for Declaration of Title and Compensation for Land Acquired for Chennai Metro Rail. Suit Filed Under CPC Order VII Rule 1 and Madras High Court Original Side Rules Seeks Compensation for Grama Natham Land in Saligramam Village.

2 Feb 2025

The plaintiff, D. Shankar, instituted Civil Suit No. 725 of 2018 before the Madras High Court seeking a declaration of ownership over three parcels of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Metro Line 4 Alignment and Land Acquisition by Private Landowners. Petitioners Contend That MMRDA Lacks Authority Under Metro Railways Act, 1978 and That Acquisition Under MRTP Act Is Invalid Without Environmental Clearances.

30 Mar 2023

Two writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the implementation and alignment of Metro Railway Line No.4 (ML-4) in Mumbai. P...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Nagpur Metro Appeal, Sets Aside High Court Order to Hand Over Possession of Land to Private Lessee. Metro Rail Project Land Allotment Upheld Subject to Outcome of Pending Civil Suit.

6 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited against the judgment of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur. The High ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Land Owners' Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. Solatium Under Section 30(1) of the 2013 Act Held Calculable Only on Market Value and Assets, Excluding Additional 12% Under Section 30(3).

17 Jul 2019

The case involves two Special Leave Petitions filed by land owners whose land was acquired for the Metro Railway project under the Metro Railways (Con...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Writ Petitions Filed Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Petitioners Sought Declaration That 1977-78 BDA Land Acquisition Had Lapsed Due to Non-Taking of Possession or Non-Payment of Compensation.

14 Dec 2017

These three sets of writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka, all relating to the acquisition of land measuring seven acres in Sur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

4 Dec 2017

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to MMRDA in Metro Fare Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court restrains Mumbai Metro One from revising fares higher than government-notified rates pending arbitration.

24 Jun 2014

The Bombay High Court was hearing an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Mumbai Metropoli...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)