Search Results for "Marumakkattayam law"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Marumakkattayam law"

5 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Marumakkathayam Partition Suit — Thavazhi Property Cannot Be Alienated Without Consent. The Court affirmed that properties acquired by female descendants under Marumakkathayam law constitute thavazhi property, and any partition or alienation by some members without the consent of all is void.

22 Nov 2024

The present appeal arises from a suit for partition filed by the plaintiffs (respondents herein) against the defendants (appellants) before the Addl. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit Based on Daughter's Inheritance Rights Under Pre-1956 Hindu Law. Property Deemed Self-Acquired, Daughter Inherits by Succession, Not Survivorship, Under Mitakshara Principles, Leading to Partition Decree for Appellants.

20 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from a partition suit filed by Thangammal, claiming a 1/5th share in properties originally owned by Marappa Gounder. The suit was di...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.

30 Sep 2015

The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will and Codicil in Favor of Executors Despite Caveat by Son — Execution and Attestation Proved Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. The court held that the Will and Codicil were duly executed and attested, and the caveator's allegations of undue influence and lack of testamentary capacity were not substantiated.

11 Jun 2014

The plaintiffs, being three of the executors named in the last Will and Testament dated 16th June, 1999 and a Codicil dated 23rd July, 2001 of Sorabji...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Expenditure Tax Act Classification Between Hindu and Mappilla Undivided Families. Differential Treatment of Hindu Undivided Families and Mappilla Families Under Marumakkattayam Law is Not Discriminatory Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, 1950.

26 Feb 1969

The case concerned a challenge under Article 14 of the Constitution to Section 3(1) of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957. The appellant was the karta of a...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)