Search Results for "Manufacturer's Address"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Manufacturer's Address"

201 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 201 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Amendment to Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Held Not Retrospective. CESTAT order allowing respondent's appeal upheld as the retrospective amendment by Finance Act, 2010 did not apply to the period prior to its enactment.

24 Aug 2023

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate against Larsen & Toubro Limited (HED) under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Food Adulteration Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 — Groundnut Oil Sample Found Adulterated. Accused's Conviction for Selling Adulterated Groundnut Oil and Carrying on Business Without License Confirmed by Appellate and Revisional Courts.

28 Jun 2023

The case involves two criminal revision applications filed by Jairam Shadija, the accused, challenging the order dated 28.08.2015 passed by the learne...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Vendor in Food Adulteration Case — Warranty Defence Under Section 19(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Accepted. Vendor Who Sold Sealed Packaged Pan Masala from Manufacturer with Warranty Is Entitled to Statutory Defence Under Section 19(2) Read with Section 14 of the Act.

26 Apr 2023

The appellant was accused in a complaint filed under Section 16(1)(a)(i) read with Section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (the Act...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Vendor in Food Adulteration Case Due to Manufacturer's Warranty Defense. Vendor of sealed pan masala held entitled to protection under Section 19(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 as he sold the product in original manufacturer's sealed package with warranty.

17 Apr 2023

The appellant was convicted under Section 16(1)(a)(i) read with Section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling adulterated pan...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State Rules on Motor Vehicle Alteration Over Central Prototype Norms. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules permit structural alterations with registering authority's approval, overriding Central Motor Vehicle Rules' restriction on deviation from prototype test.

9 Jan 2019

The case involved a conflict of judicial opinion in the Kerala High Court regarding the permissibility of structural alterations to motor vehicles tha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Section 140(3)(iv) of CGST Act on Transitional Credit for Pre-GST Stock. Petitioners Argue Arbitrary Cut-Off Date Leads to Double Taxation and Discrimination.

20 Mar 2018

A group of manufacturers and traders, including JCB India Limited, manufacturers of excavators and loaders, filed writ petitions before the Bombay Hig...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Imposed on Public Sector Oil Company for Alleged Legal Metrology Violation — Lack of Mens Rea and Procedural Irregularities. Show Cause Notice Must Specify Exact Violation Under Section 50 of Legal Metrology Act, 2009.

31 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, a public sector oil company, challenged an order dated 4/9/2013 passed by the Secretary, Legal Metrolo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Steel Products Classified as 'Angles, Shapes and Sections' Under Section 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944. Court holds that MRP-based valuation applies only when product is covered by Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and rules thereunder.

27 Sep 2013

The judgment involves three writ appeals filed by M/s Meenakshi Steel Re-rolling Mills and M/s Bhuwalka Steel Industries Limited against the Union of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate Claim of Dealer in Central Excise Case — Revenue's Revision Rejected for Ignoring Evidence. Dealer entitled to rebate under Rule 12(1)(a) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Section 35EE of Central Excise Act, 1944 when duty paid to manufacturer and not passed on to exporter.

10 Aug 2010

The Petitioners, M/s. Madhav Steel (a partnership firm) and its partner R.J. Virwadia, filed a writ petition challenging the Order dated 29th May 2006...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Marketer in Weights and Measures Case — Manufacturer Already Convicted and Fined for Non-Declaration of Retail Sale Price Under Packaged Commodities Rules, 1977.

5 Dec 2006

The applicants, Colgate Palmolive India Ltd. and others, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeki...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)