Search Results for "Malegaon bomb blast"

8 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals of Accused in UAPA Terror Case, Upholding NIA Investigation and Rejecting Torture Allegations. Court holds that stringent bail conditions under Section 43D(5) of UAPA apply and that delay in raising torture claims without medical evidence is fatal.

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals filed by accused persons (Rajendra Chaudhary and Dhan Singh in Appeal No.107/2026, and Manohar Narwaria and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeal Against Rejection of Bail in Malegaon Bomb Blast Case. Accused Charged Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and Other Serious Offences Seeks Release Pending Trial.

The appeal arose from the rejection of a bail application by the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 and the Nati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Accused No.1's Bail Appeal in Malegaon Bombing Case Charging Conspiracy and Terror Offences. Appeal Questions Special Court's Rejection of Bail Application Pursuant to Supreme Court Direction to Exclude MCOC Act Provisions.

The judgment under consideration arises from a criminal appeal filed by Accused No.1 against the Special Court's order rejecting her bail application ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging POTA Sanction and Review Committee's Confirmation. Court upholds validity of sanction under Section 45 of POTA and affirms that POTA Review Committee has jurisdiction to confirm or revoke sanction under Section 60 of POTA.

The petitioners, who were accused in a case involving offences under the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (POTA) and the Unlawful Activities (Prevent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Appeal in POTA Case for Mulund Bomb Blast Accused. Appellant's claim of illegal detention and fresh evidence under RTI did not warrant bail due to serious allegations and lack of changed circumstances.

The appellant, Adnan Bilal Mulla, was accused no.15 in POTA Special Case No. 2 of 2003, arising from three bomb blasts in Mumbai Central (6/12/2003), ...