Search Results for "Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal"

714 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 714 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Abolition of Odisha Administrative Tribunal — Power to Abolish SATs Upheld Under General Clauses Act and Article 323-A. The Court held that the Union Government has the power to abolish a State Administrative Tribunal established under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, and the notification dated 2 August 2019 is valid.

21 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the Orissa High Court judgment upholding the abolition of the Odisha Administrative Tribunal (OAT). The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 21(5) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1989 Allowing Non-Judicial Member as President of Tribunal. Challenge to Appointment of IAS Officer as President Dismissed as Provision Does Not Violate Basic Structure.

28 Sep 2017

The Sales Tax Tribunal Bar Association and its President filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds 2020 Tribunal Rules with Modifications to Ensure Judicial Independence. Court directs changes to Search-cum-Selection Committee composition and member qualifications to align with constitutional principles.

27 Nov 2020

The Supreme Court of India was called upon to decide the constitutional validity of the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualificat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Arbitral Tribunal Cannot Appoint Court Receiver Under Section 17 of Arbitration Act. Court Receiver is an Officer of the High Court Subject Only to Chief Justice's Supervision.

16 Mar 2017

The Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay filed a Report seeking directions on whether the Registry should accept matters where an Arbitral Tribunal appo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Administrative Tribunals Act Case on Jurisdictional Grounds - High Court at Calcutta Found Lacking Jurisdiction to Review Transfer Order Passed by Principal Bench at New Delhi. Judicial Review of Tribunal Transfer Orders Under Article 226/227 Lies with High Court Within Whose Territorial Jurisdiction the Tribunal Bench Passing the Order is Located, Not Where Original Application Was Filed Under Section 25 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

6 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court addressed a jurisdictional question concerning judicial review of transfer orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Directions to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals for Compliance with Procedural Rules. Court Holds That Insistence on Personal Appearance of Claimants at Filing Is Not Mandatory Under Rule 254(2) of Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.

21 Dec 2016

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Anil Prabhakar Tadkalkar, a practicing advocate, raising several issues concerning the disposal of claim ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging State Circulars on Reservation in Public Services for Lack of Maintainability. Petitioners Must First Approach Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal Under Section 15 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

24 Oct 2016

This batch of writ petitions was filed before the Bombay High Court challenging certain circulars issued by the State Government concerning reservatio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences in Service Matter — Retirement Age Enhancement Not Applicable to Autonomous Body Employees. The Court held that the Cabinet decision to enhance superannuation age to 65 years for AYUSH doctors was limited to those directly under the Ministry of AYUSH and CGHS, and did not extend to employees of autonomous bodies like CCRAS.

1 Jan 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences (CCRAS) and its Director General against the judgment of the Ori...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Direct Recruit Section Officers' Seniority Over Promotees in Maharashtra Secretariat Service. Seniority to be determined from date of substantive appointment, not from date of ad-hoc promotion.

6 Aug 2018

The case involves four writ petitions filed by direct recruit Section Officers and promotee Section Officers of the Maharashtra Secretariat Service, c...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against NGT Orders in Sterlite Copper Plant Closure Case — Upholds Maintainability of Composite Appeal Under NGT Act. The Court held that a composite appeal under Section 16 of the NGT Act is maintainable and that closure orders without natural justice are invalid.

18 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from orders of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) concerning the closure of a copper smelter p...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)