Search Results for "Madhuri Patil Directions"

80 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Addresses Caste Certificate Verification and Affinity Test in Scheduled Tribe Claims Under Maharashtra Act. The Court examines procedural guidelines and the role of affinity tests in determining caste claims, referencing prior judicial directives and legislative frameworks.

The dispute centered on the verification of caste certificates for Scheduled Tribes in Maharashtra, involving procedural guidelines and the role of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Invalidated Thakur Tribe Certificate for MBBS Admission. Court Holds Scrutiny Committee Failed to Consider Valid Precedent Certificates of Relatives and Directs Reconsideration.

The petitioner, Ritesh Rajendra Thakur, challenged the order dated 14.03.2016 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Caste Scrutiny Committee Composition Under Maharashtra Act of 2000. Judicial Directions in Kumari Madhuri Patil Stand Subsumed by Subsequent Legislation.

The judgment arises from a batch of civil appeals concerning the validity of caste certificates issued to respondents who claimed Scheduled Caste/Sche...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Certificate Validation Due to Lack of Proper Enquiry. Scrutiny Committee's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure Under Goa Caste Certificate Rules, 2011.

The petitioner, Zacarias Mendes, challenged the order dated 18.03.2014 of the Scrutiny Committee of Caste Certificates, Government of Goa, which valid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Caste Certificate Invalidation as Not Maintainable Before Division Bench. Preliminary objection upheld that matters under Act 23 of 2001 must be heard by Single Judge as per Chapter XVII Rule 18(3) of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.

The petitioner, Nilofarnaz w/o Nazkatkhan, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Scheduled Tribe Claim Due to Inadequate Vigilance Enquiry. Failure to Conduct Personal Verification at Petitioner's Residence as Mandated by Madhuri Patil Directions Renders Committee Order Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Archana d/o Narayan Balsaraf, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 22.01.2001 passed by the Committee for Scrutiny & Veri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Judicial Officers as Chairpersons of Scrutiny Committees for Scheduled Tribe Verification. Court holds that appointment of Chairpersons is an administrative policy decision and not a matter for judicial mandate.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Adivasi Thakur Jamat Seva Mandal, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the State of Mah...