Search Results for "MVAT set off"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "MVAT set off"

35 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Restricts Provisional Attachment to Disputed Amount in MVAT Act Case — Section 48(5) Constitutional Challenge Rejected. Court holds that attachment under Section 35 must be proportionate, and directs respondents to limit attachment to Rs.1.81 crores.

30 Apr 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Premium Paper and Board Industries Ltd., a registered dealer under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and the C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Pre-Deposit Dispute — Protest Payment Can Be Adjusted Against Mandatory Pre-Deposit for Appeal. The Court held that under Section 26(6A) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, amounts paid under protest before assessment can be adjusted against the 10% pre-deposit required for appeal, as the provision requires 10% of disputed tax, not arrears.

3 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by VVF (India) Limited against the State of Maharashtra and others, setting aside the Bombay High Court's judgment...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in MVAT Case — Tribunal's Liberal Interpretation of Section 23(5) Upheld for Concessional Tax Rate on C Forms. The court held that the Tribunal was justified in allowing the respondent's claim for concessional rate of tax under Section 23(5) of the MVAT Act, 2002, even though the claim was not part of the original assessment order.

8 Sep 2022

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 27 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) challenging the judgment of the Maha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in VAT Classification of Electric Bicycle — EBikeMatrix Held to Be a Bicycle Under Schedule Entry C14 of MVAT Act, 2002. The court held that a bicycle with an auxiliary electric motor of less than 0.5 KW and battery backup is a 'bicycle' under Entry C14, taxable at 4%, not 12.5%.

6 May 2010

The appellant, M/s R.K. Rim Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of bicycles, started producing a product called 'EBikeMatrix', which is a bicycle with an auxili...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Case — Works Contract Valuation Must Exclude Land Value Under Rule 58. Land value deduction under Rule 58 of MVAT Rules is mandatory for works contracts involving transfer of immovable property, and the Tribunal erred in restricting deduction to 20%.

26 Jul 2023

The Appellant, Oasis Realty, an association of persons registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and Central Sales Tax Act...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in MVAT Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Natural Justice. Inter-State Stock Transfer Not a Sale Under MVAT Act, 2002; Reassessment Beyond 4-Year Limitation Period Invalid.

29 Apr 2022

The petitioner, M/s. United Spirits Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages, filed a writ petition challenging a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Works Contractor's Petition Challenging MVAT Assessment on Offshore Platform — Transfer of Property Occurred Outside State of Maharashtra. The court held that the State of Maharashtra lacks jurisdiction to levy tax under the MVAT Act on goods transferred in execution of a works contract on an offshore platform located in the exclusive economic zone, as the transfer of property took place outside the State.

15 Jun 2022

The petitioner, HAL Offshore Ltd., a public limited company and works contractor, challenged an assessment order passed under the Maharashtra Value Ad...

High Court

High Court Quashes Tax Refund Adjustment Order for Violation of Settlement Scheme and Natural Justice. Adjustment of refund for one tax period against demand for another under proviso to Section 50(1) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 held invalid when petitioner had applied under Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Tax, Interest, Penalty or Late Fees Act, 2023 and no defect notice was issued.

12 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a proprietorship concern registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 challenging a settlement order dated 18 April...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Assessment of VAT Refund Claims for Three Proprietary Concerns Under Section 48(6) of MVAT Act, 2002. Court Orders Finalization of Assessment for 2007-08 Within Three Months to Enable Set Off or Refund of Excess Input Tax Credit.

4 Feb 2015

The petitioners, three proprietary concerns, filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench seeking a direction to the respondents ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Bunker Fuel Sales to Vessels on High Seas Are Taxable Under Maharashtra VAT Act. Petitioners Challenged Assessment Orders and Recovery Notices Claiming Sales Occurred Outside State Territory and Were in Course of Export.

19 Oct 2015

The dispute arose from assessment and recovery proceedings under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 concerning sales of High Speed Diesel (HSD)...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)