Search Results for "MTM losses"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "MTM losses"

10 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Findings of Fact and Rejects Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Jul 2016

The judgment concerns multiple arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Finding That Broker Failed to Prove Client's Liability. Member Client Agreement and Running Account Basis Did Not Shift Burden of Proof to Client Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a member of Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. (MCX), filed a petition under Section 34 of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against RBI for Alleged Disobedience of RTI Directions. RBI's Disclosure Policy and Individual Information Requests Held Not in Contempt of Court's Earlier Judgment.

26 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed three contempt petitions filed against the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) alleging wilful disobedience of its judgment dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matters — Single Judge Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 34 by Setting Aside Award and Remanding for Reconsideration Without Finding Award to Be Void or Inoperative. The Court Held That Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Does Not Confer Power of Remand; Only Remedies Are to Uphold, Modify, or Set Aside the Award.

25 Jun 2013

The appellant, Geojit Financial Services Limited (now Geojit BNP Paribas Financial Services Limited), a stock broker registered with the National Stoc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award is Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's concurrent findings rejecting both claim and counterclaim for lack of evidence.

18 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Ventura Securities Ltd., a member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSEIL) and Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (BSEL), was a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act — Upholds Broker's Right to Square Off Client Positions Without T+1 Notice Under Member Client Agreement. The court held that the arbitral award was not perverse or contrary to public policy as the broker acted in accordance with the contract terms.

26 Apr 2016

The appeal was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd. (the appellant/broker) a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Upholds Award as Not Suffering from Patent Illegality or Being Against Public Policy, Refusing to Reappreciate Evidence.

31 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Angel Capital & Debt Market Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 May 2009 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Award for Squaring Off Due to Margin Default. Member-Client Agreement and Electronic Contract Notes Establish Liability for Margin Shortfall Under Byelaws of Stock Exchange.

6 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Sizarali M. Dodhia, a constituent of the respondent, Angel Capital & Debt Market Ltd., entered into a member-client agreement on 21 Au...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Finding That Trades Were Authorized by Client. Court holds that under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the arbitral award is not patently illegal or perverse and does not warrant interference.

17 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar Sharma, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Broking Dispute — Mitigation of Damages Upheld. Court holds that the arbitral tribunal's finding on failure to mitigate damages within a reasonable period is a finding of fact not amenable to interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

19 Jul 2013

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Learned Single Judge dated 17 April 2012 dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)