Search Results for "MCX Stock Exchange"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "MCX Stock Exchange"

14 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award Holding Put and Call Options in Share Purchase Agreement as Enforceable. The court held that clauses 8.5 and 8.5.1 of the Share Purchase Agreement are not forward contracts or derivatives under SCRA and SEBI circulars, and the Single Judge erred in setting aside the award.

2 Feb 2023

The appellants, Percept Finserve Private Limited and Percept Limited, entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with Edelweiss Financial Services Limite...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Section 9 Petition in Part Recognizing IGRC Order as Conciliation Settlement Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court ruled that the IGRC order, with mutual acknowledgment, constitutes a settlement agreement under Sections 73 and 74 of the Act, and the petitioner must pursue civil remedies against respondents not party to the exchange bye-laws' dispute resolution mechanism.

19 Mar 2021

The dispute arose from commodity futures trading where Titan Co. Ltd., a company dealing in watches and jewellery, engaged Karvy Comtrade Ltd., a comm...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Limitation Bar — Winding Up Petition Filed Beyond Three Years from Default Date Cannot Be Revived Under IBC. The Court held that a time-barred winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be treated as a valid Section 7 application under the IBC, and the filing of a suit for specific performance does not extend limitation for a winding up petition.

25 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from the admission of a winding up petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Dispute for Patent Illegality and Perversity. The court found that the arbitrator's interpretation of a condition subsequent in a share purchase agreement was patently illegal and perverse, warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Mar 2019

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award arising from a share purchase agree...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Findings of Fact and Rejects Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Jul 2016

The judgment concerns multiple arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Specific Performance Suit Involving Share Buyback Under Letter of Undertaking. The appeal challenges the grant of interim injunction on grounds that the agreement is not a concluded contract and that its performance would breach MIMPS Regulations making it void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

11 Sep 2015

The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arises from an order dated 13 October 2014 passed by a single judge granting interim inj...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears SEBI's Application to Recall Sanction of Composite Scheme in Fertilizers Merger Case. Securities Regulator Alleges Material Non-Disclosure and Accounting Violations in Scheme Involving Listed and Unlisted Companies Under Companies Act, 1956.

10 Sep 2015

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) filed applications on 21.02.2013 seeking recall of orders of the Bombay High Court dated 17.06.2011 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commodity Trading Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claim for Unauthorized Trades Without Considering Evidence of Unauthorized Transactions.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Mrs. Kaberi Mondal, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging portions of an arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Finding That Broker Failed to Prove Client's Liability. Member Client Agreement and Running Account Basis Did Not Shift Burden of Proof to Client Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a member of Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. (MCX), filed a petition under Section 34 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Dec 2014

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)