Search Results for "Lokayukta trap"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 17A of PC Act — FIR Registered Without Prior Approval from Competent Authority for Investigation Against Public Servant

The petitioner, Ningappa G @ Ningappa Savant, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) / Section 52...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Government Engineer in Lokayukta Case — Source Information Report Lacks Credible Material. Court holds that mere source information without verification cannot justify registration of crime under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, an Assistant Executive Engineer in the Public Works Department and currently functioning as Assistant Director of Town Planning, Yelah...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction in Bribery Case. Appeal Challenges Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act for Accepting ₹1,000 Bribe for Caste Verification Certificate.

The case arose from a complaint filed by Kiran Kumar, a temporary driver with BMTC, who alleged that T. Siddaiah, a First Division Assistant in the Ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Disciplinary Entrustment Orders Passed Against BBMP Employees After Acquittal in Bribery Cases. Court Finds Government Failed to Apply Mind Under Section 12(4) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 and There Was Inordinate Delay in Initiating Proceedings.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru adjudicated two writ petitions filed by BBMP employees, K.S. Nanjegowda and N.G. Nataraj, who challenged gove...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction of Accused in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Appellant, a surveyor, challenged conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Act, contending that sanction order was invalid and amount received was legal fees.

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from the judgment of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in Special Case No.67/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal was filed by Gangamma, a Supervisor in the Women and Child Welfare Department, challenging her conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Unreliable Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, G B Jagadeesh, was convicted by the Special Judge, Davanagere, in Spl.C.(Lokayukta) No.9/2007 for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Acquits Police Officers in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was interested and independent witnesses turned hostile.

The case involves two appeals by accused police officers (Ramaiah, Police Head Constable, and T.R. Hanumanthaiah, Police Sub-Inspector) against their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010300082015_1

The appeal arose from the conviction of two public servants employed in the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) for demanding and accept...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...