Search Results for "Lok-Adalat settlement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Lok-Adalat settlement"

8 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Writ Petitions Challenging Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Awards. Court holds that the Insurance Company cannot challenge the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal without depositing the entire awarded amount under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

26 Feb 2022

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. filed three writ petitions (WP No. 12529/2021, 12530/2021, and 12532/2021) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Be...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Divorce by Mutual Consent Case — Restores Trial Court's Decree Under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. First Appellate Court Erred in Setting Aside Mutual Consent Divorce After Full Payment of Settlement Amount and Withdrawal of Consent by Wife.

9 Feb 2022

The appellant-husband and respondent-wife were married on 01/02/1998 as per Hindu rites. Disputes arose, leading to the wife filing a suit for restitu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Lok-Adalat Settlement in Cheque Dishonour Case — Petitioner Failed to Comply with Settlement Terms and Subsequent Orders. The court held that the petitioner cannot re-agitate issues already decided in earlier criminal petitions, and the writ petition is an abuse of process under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

9 Oct 2018

The petitioner, B. Mallikarjun Reddy, proprietor of Sri Vinayaka Mines & Minerals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Lok Adalat Decree in Specific Performance Suit — Compromise Decree Held Final Under Section 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act. Consideration in Compromise Agreement is Implicit in Mutual Settlement, Not Subject to Challenge Under Indian Contract Act.

13 Sep 2017

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the judgment debtor (applicant) challenging the order dated 6.4.2017 passed by the executing C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Specific Performance Suit — Res Judicata Not Applicable to Lok Adalat Award. Court holds that a compromise decree passed by Lok Adalat does not bar a subsequent suit for specific performance of the same agreement.

29 Jun 2017

The revision application was filed by the petitioner (Ajitpalsingh Khalsa) against the order dated 21/11/2015 passed by the Jt. Civil Judge (SD) Amrav...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC — Confirms Three-Year Rigorous Imprisonment and Compensation of Rs.70,000. Revision Petition Dismissed as Concurrent Findings of Fact and Law on Cruelty and Demand for Dowry Are Not Shown to Be Perverse or Unreasonable.

24 Apr 2017

The revision petitioner, Babanrao Dnyandoba Shinde, was the husband of the informant Suvarna Shinde. Their marriage was solemnized in 1993. The wife a...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Lok Adalat Award Against Insurance Company in Motor Accident Claim — Consent Given Without Proper Verification. Act Only Policy Does Not Cover Occupant of Vehicle, and Lok Adalat Award Based on Misunderstanding of Advocate's Presence is Set Aside.

26 Mar 2015

The petitioner, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the Lok Adalat award dated 3.3.2013 in Motor Accident Claim Petitio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Maha Lok Adalat Order Due to Delay and Laches. Challenge to Change Report Under Section 22 of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 Barred by Delay of Over Two Years.

24 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Rajabhau Damodar Raikar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order passed by the Maha ...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)