Search Results for "Lok Adalat jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Lok Adalat jurisdiction"

60 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 60 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Regarding Lok Adalat Award as Basis for Compensation Redetermination. Court Held That Lok Adalat Award Under Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 Does Not Qualify as Determination by 'Court' Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as It Is Based on Compromise and Lacks Adjudicatory Function.

3 Feb 2022

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals concerning the interpretation of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in relation to Awards p...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Lok Adalat Order in Writ Petition Due to Jurisdictional Overreach Under Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. Lok Adalat Lacks Authority to Decide Cases on Merits When No Settlement is Reached, Must Return Case to Referring Court as Per Sections 19(5) and 20(5) of the Act.

7 Oct 2021

The dispute arose from an order dated 30.11.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore, in Writ Petition No. 8074 of 2011, where...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lok Adalat Award in BSNL Dues Dispute — Lack of Consent Invalidates Compromise. Permanent Lok Adalat Cannot Pass Award Without Parties' Consent Under Section 22C of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

14 Feb 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Mac Charles (I) Ltd, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, had subscribed to telephone lines from the respondent, B...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Application Under Section 431 Cr.P.C. in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Compromise Petition Under Section 147 N.I. Act Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure. The court held that the trial court must examine the compromise and pass appropriate orders under Section 431 Cr.P.C. before dismissing the application.

7 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Sri Somashekara Reddy, proprietor of Sunlight Solar Technology, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Retired Employee Against State's Challenge to Lok Nyayalaya Order. The Court held that the Lok Nyayalaya's order directing pensionary benefits was binding and the State could not bypass it by filing a writ petition without exhausting alternative remedies.

7 Mar 2006

The appeal arises from a judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court allowing a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra and the Mahara...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Lok Adalat Award Against Insurance Company in Motor Accident Claim — Consent Given Without Proper Verification. Act Only Policy Does Not Cover Occupant of Vehicle, and Lok Adalat Award Based on Misunderstanding of Advocate's Presence is Set Aside.

26 Mar 2015

The petitioner, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the Lok Adalat award dated 3.3.2013 in Motor Accident Claim Petitio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows 100% Refund of Court Fees on Settlement in Lok Adalat Under Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. The Court held that Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 overrides the Court Fees Act, 1870, entitling the petitioner to full refund of court fees paid on settlement before Lok Adalat.

2 Apr 2019

The petitioner, a sugar factory, filed money suits against respondents in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division at Malshiras, District Solapur. Th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lok Adalat Award in Non-Compoundable Excise Offence Case — Lok Adalat Lacks Jurisdiction to Determine Non-Compoundable Offences. Reference by Magistrate to Lok Adalat for Non-Compoundable Offence Under Sections 32 and 34 of Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 Held Without Jurisdiction.

11 Jun 2021

The State of Karnataka, through Akkur Police Station, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Lok Adalat Decree in Tenancy Land Suit — Consent Award Without Scrutiny of Tenancy Proceedings Held Void. Court holds that Lok Adalat award based on consent terms in a suit involving agricultural land is illegal when the civil court had earlier directed examination of pending tenancy proceedings under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

18 Dec 2014

The petitioners, who were plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit No.14 of 2012, filed a suit for injunction concerning agricultural lands. On 17 March 2012,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Maha Lok Adalat Order Due to Delay and Laches. Challenge to Change Report Under Section 22 of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 Barred by Delay of Over Two Years.

24 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Rajabhau Damodar Raikar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order passed by the Maha ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)