Search Results for "Lok Adalat Award"

107 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 107 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Lok Adalat Award in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Claimants' Signatures on Settlement Memo. Lok Adalat Award Set Aside as Settlement Memo Not Signed by Claimants, Violating Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and Appeal Restored for Merits Hearing.

The dispute arose from a motor accident claim where the husband and father of the petitioners died in a road traffic accident. The Motor Accidents Cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Lok Adalat Award for Lack of Valid Reference Under Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. Petitioner's Signature Obtained Without Proper Procedure Renders Award Void.

The petitioner, Madhukar Baburao Shete, a senior citizen with 95% physical disability, challenged an award passed by the Lok Adalat in Regular Civil S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Lok Adalat Order in Writ Petition Due to Jurisdictional Overreach Under Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. Lok Adalat Lacks Authority to Decide Cases on Merits When No Settlement is Reached, Must Return Case to Referring Court as Per Sections 19(5) and 20(5) of the Act.

The dispute arose from an order dated 30.11.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore, in Writ Petition No. 8074 of 2011, where...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act Based on Lok Adalat Award. Lok Adalat Award Not an Award of Court Under Part III of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners' land was acquired by the State for a storage lake along with other lands. An award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lok Adalat Award in BSNL Dues Dispute — Lack of Consent Invalidates Compromise. Permanent Lok Adalat Cannot Pass Award Without Parties' Consent Under Section 22C of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

The petitioner, M/s. Mac Charles (I) Ltd, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, had subscribed to telephone lines from the respondent, B...