Search Results for "Life-Saving Treatment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Life-Saving Treatment"

6 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Medical Reimbursement Claim for CRT-D Implantation Under CGHS — Rejects Technical Grounds for Denial of Life-Saving Treatment. The Court held that denial of reimbursement for a life-saving treatment not listed in the CGHS rate list is unsustainable and directed full reimbursement.

3 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Mrs. Ivy Miller Chahal, aged 75 years, is the widow of late Gurmail Singh Chahal. She filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition by Retired Central Government Employee Against Union of India Regarding Reimbursement of Heart Transplant Expenses. The Court Considers Whether Normal Reimbursement Rules Should Be Relaxed in Life-Saving Situations Where Treatment Not Available in Empanelled Hospitals.

6 Jun 2025

The petitioner, a retired Central Government employee from Pune, was a pensioner residing in Mumbai. He voluntarily retired in March 2008 as Assistant...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Applicant in Medical Treatment Withdrawal Case — CANH Held to Be Medical Treatment and Withdrawal Permitted Under Best Interest Principle. Right to Die with Dignity under Article 21 Recognised to Include Withholding of Life-Sustaining Treatment from Patient in Permanent Vegetative State.

1 Jan 1970

The matter arose from a tragic accident in 2013 when Harish Rana, then a 20-year-old engineering student, fell from the fourth floor of his accommodat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Notification Restricting Oxytocin Manufacture to Public Sector. Notification under Section 26A of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 held invalid for being arbitrary and disproportionate to the objective of curbing misuse.

22 Aug 2019

The case involves a challenge to a notification issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Heard Appeal by Disabled Advocate Challenging Inadequate Compensation for Human Rights Violations During Arrest and Incarceration. High Court Enhanced Compensation and Issued Directions for Police Sensitization and CCTV Monitoring.

26 Jul 2026

The appellant, an advocate with 70% loco-motor disability (Becker Muscular Dystrophy) and autism, was arrested on 29.02.2020 based on an FIR for IPC o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Medical Education for Persons with Disabilities — Ensures Equal Opportunity and Reasonable Accommodation

21 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court set aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s order and directed admission of a PwD candidate to the MBBS course, emphasizing the ...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)