Search Results for "License Renewal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "License Renewal"

279 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 279 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses HPCL's Revision Against Eviction Decree in Lease Renewal Dispute. HPCL's Claim of Statutory Right to Renew Lease Under Section 7(3) of Caltex Act Rejected as Lease Was Not Renewed Before Expiry of Original Term.

19 Nov 2024

The case involves a dispute between Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL), the revision applicant, and the legal heirs of Mansukhlal Doshi, t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of CL-III License for Violation of Natural Justice and Statutory Procedure. License Suspension Set Aside as Collector Failed to Follow Mandatory Procedure Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 and Maharashtra Country Liquor Rules, 1973.

27 Sep 2022

The petitioners, Smt. Aruna Mohanbabu Jaiswal and Sau. Alka Uday Jaiswal, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 06/05/2022 passed by the C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Compliance of Settlement in Contempt Proceedings for Non-Renewal of Licenses - Home Buyers' Interests Paramount. The Court held that the Mittal Group must pay renewal license fee and avail OTS scheme, while the Seth Group must pay its share of EDC and furnish documents, failing which contempt action including attachment and imprisonment would follow.

9 Oct 2020

The dispute in this contempt petition arises from a Memorandum of Settlement (MOS) dated 04.05.2015 between the Seth Group and the Mittal Group, which...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Non-Compliance of Settlement in Joint Venture Dispute — Reciprocal Obligations Not Fulfilled by Either Party. Court finds no wilful disobedience as both Seth Group and Mittal Group failed to comply with their respective obligations under the Memorandum of Settlement dated 4.5.2015.

24 Apr 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed three contempt petitions arising from a joint venture dispute between the Seth Group and the Mittal Group over the develop...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 37(1)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Sets Aside Trial Court Order Dismissing Section 9 Application for Injunction. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement and prima facie case for interim relief must be considered at the stage of Section 9 application, and the trial court erred in dismissing the application without considering the merits.

2 Aug 2017

The appellant, M/s Equestrain Centre for Excellence, filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an in...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Transport Appellate Tribunal Order in Motor Vehicles Act Case — Lack of Jurisdiction to Review Own Orders. The Tribunal cannot review its own orders under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as no power of review is conferred by the Act or Rules.

5 Apr 2017

The petitioners, who are private bus operators, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging IRDA's Rejection of Insurance Broker License Transfer. Transfer of Corporate Agency License Requires Prior Approval Under Insurance Act, 1938 and IRDA Regulations.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioners, including Wills India Insurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Canceling Cinema License for Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Speaking Order. Appellate Authority Under Section 8A of Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953 Cannot Cancel License Without Recording Findings on Grounds Under Section 6.

27 Oct 2010

The petitioners, Deepak Joshi and the legal representatives of Ravi K. Appu, challenged an order dated 28.01.1999 passed by the State Minister (Home),...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Licensee's Challenge to Arrears Demand and License Lapse in Bombay Prohibition Act Case. Demand for License Fee Arrears for Period Prior to License Grant Held Unenforceable and License Cannot Lapse Without Notice.

13 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Suresh Krishnaji Lakudkar, held a CLIII license under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, for the sale of foreign liquor. In Writ Petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Fair Price Shop Licenses Without Hearing — Violation of Natural Justice and Section 6 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The court held that cancellation of license without affording an opportunity of hearing is illegal and set aside the impugned orders.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by fair price shop license holders and kerosene dealers challenging the cancellation of their license...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)