Search Results for "LIC Pension Rules 1995"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "LIC Pension Rules 1995"

9 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service Under Rule 23 of LIC Pension Rules, 1995, and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement.

15 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

15 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows LIC's Appeal Against Resigned Employee's Pension Claim — Resignation Not Voluntary Retirement Under Pension Rules. Employee Who Resigned Before Pension Scheme Notification Not Entitled to Retrospective Benefits Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

15 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, United India Insurance Company Limite...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Employer in Pension Dispute, Holding Resignation Forfeits Past Service. Employee Who Resigned Before Pension Rules Came Into Force Not Entitled to Pensionary Benefits Despite Completing 22 Years of Service.

5 Dec 2019

The case involves an appeal by BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. against a Delhi High Court judgment granting pensionary benefits to the first respondent, Ghansh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Unauthorised Absence from Qualifying Service for Pension in DTC VRS Cases. The court held that period of absence without authorisation cannot be counted towards qualifying service for pension under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, even if employee availed VRS.

26 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) against the respondents, ex-employees who had availed of the Vol...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Pensionary Benefits to Deceased Employee's Legal Heirs in Delhi Transport Corporation Case — Resignation After 30 Years of Service Does Not Forfeit Pension Under Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. Employee's Long Service and Liberal Construction of Resignation Letter Entitle Him to Pension and Other Retiral Benefits Despite Resignation.

1 Jan 2025

The case involves an appeal by the legal heirs of Ashok Kumar Dabas, a deceased employee of Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), against the denial of p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Retired Employee Seeking Modification of Annuity Option Under Post-Retirement Benefit Scheme. Option Once Exercised Under Super Annuation Benefit Fund Scheme Cannot Be Changed After Retirement, as It Would Affect Contractual Rights of Corporation and LIC.

22 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Avinash Trimbak Namjoshi, was an employee of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Respondent No.1) who joined on 22nd June 1966 and opted for ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retirement Age Reduction by National Textile Corporation. Division Bench precedent upholding rollback from 60 to 58 years held binding.

17 Aug 2006

The petitioners, three employees of India United Mills prior to its nationalization under the Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalization) Act, 1974, c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Favor of Executor Despite Allegations of Suspicious Circumstances. Will executed by testatrix with firm signature and solicitor-drafted formality upheld as valid under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

23 Jun 2016

The plaintiff, Chittaranjan N. Negandhi, sought probate of a Will dated 24th May 1973 left by his mother, Bhanumati Narottamdas Chapsi. Bhanumati died...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)