Search Results for "Kundan Pendor"

8 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR — Conviction for Rape and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Guruprasad Daulat Bhalavi, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special POCSO Case 224/2016 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping of Minor Girl. Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offences Under Sections 5(1) and 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 363, 366A, 376 of IPC.

The appellant, Rupesh Parasram Nehare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Warora in Special (POCSO) Case No. 05 of 2015 for offences under Section 5(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Appeal for Non-Prosecution Due to Repeated Absence of Counsel. Court Relies on Bani Singh Precedent to Dismiss Appeal on Merits After Counsel Fails to Appear Despite Multiple Opportunities.

The appellant, Ramkrishna Ganesh Wagh, was convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the Sessions Court, Akola, in Sessions Trial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramprasad s/o Fagulal Amdare, was convicted by the Special Judge, POCSO Act, Nagpur, for offences under Section 6 read with Section 5(n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4 and 8 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Sexual Assault.

The appellant, Dadarao Gotiramji Khandare, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Amravati, under Sections 4 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction Under POCSO Act and IPC for Rape of 13-Year-Old. Victim's Testimony Found Reliable and Corroborated by Medical Evidence; Defence of False Implication Rejected.

The criminal appeal before the High Court arose from the conviction of the accused under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Conviction under Sections 3(a), 5(j)(ii), 5(l) of POCSO Act and Sections 376, 417 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's age not proven beyond reasonable doubt and relationship was consensual.

The appellant, Kundan Pendor, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 3(a), 5(j)(ii), and 5(l) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...