Search Results for "Kolhapur District Bar Association"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Kolhapur District Bar Association"

37 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Kolhapur District Bar Association on Maintainability Grounds. Bar Association Held Not State Under Article 12; Writ Not Maintainable for Disputes Between Members and Association; Remedy Lies in Civil Suit.

21 Apr 2025

The petitioners, four advocates and members of the Kolhapur District Bar Association, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bar Association's Challenge to Establishment of District Court at Wai — No Locus Standi for Competing Bar Association. The court held that a district bar association cannot challenge the establishment of a court at a taluka place on grounds of inconvenience or lack of infrastructure, as such decisions are within the exclusive domain of the High Court's administrative power under Article 235 of the Constitution of India.

22 Mar 2022

The Satara District Bar Association filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the approvals dated 31st July 201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Boycott of Courts by Lawyers for Demand of Bench at Pune/Kolhapur Constitutes Criminal Contempt. The Court ruled that abstention from court work and calls for boycott by Bar Associations to pressurize the government for establishment of a bench amounts to interference with the administration of justice and is criminal contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

15 Sep 2017

The judgment arises from a suo moto criminal contempt petition initiated by the Bombay High Court and a connected writ petition filed by Manoj Oswal. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Suits in Trademark Dispute from Kopargaon to Nagpur for Convenience of Parties and Witnesses. The court held that the balance of convenience favors transfer under Section 24 CPC where all parties and witnesses are based in Nagpur and the subject matter is connected to Nagpur.

7 May 2013

The judgment concerns two Misc. Civil Applications filed by Nagpur Distillers Pvt. Ltd. and Vidarbha Distillers seeking transfer of three suits (Suit ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Bar Council Elections and Advocate Enrollment Rules. Court upholds Bar Council of India's power to prescribe enrollment conditions under Section 49 of Advocates Act, 1961 and rejects challenge to election process for lack of merit.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Manubhai Paragji Vashi, an advocate aged about 79 years, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the election p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Public Interest Litigations in Road Development Contract Dispute. Reiterates Stringent Locus Standi Requirements Under Article 226 to Prevent Abuse of Process by Meddlesome Bystanders.

14 Oct 2014

The Bombay High Court examined the maintainability of multiple public interest litigations and writ petitions concerning the Kolhapur Integrated Road ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Government Corrigendum Allowing Multiple Cooperative Societies in One Revenue Village. The Court upheld the State Government's authority to amend its policy to permit more than one Primary Agricultural Credit Cooperative Society (PACCS) in a revenue village, finding the corrigendum valid and in the interest of cooperative development.

30 Aug 2024

The judgment concerns three writ petitions challenging a Government Corrigendum dated 14th February 2017 issued by the Ministry of Cooperation, Market...

High Court

Bombay High Court Split Bench Delivers Dissenting Opinion on Bar Council Election Rules Validity; Dissenting Judge Holds Rules 6(h) and 32(g) Intra Vires Advocates Act. The dissenting opinion concluded that the impugned election rules did not violate Sections 3(2)(b), 3(4) and 49(1)(a) of the Advocates Act, 1961.

13 Dec 2006

This matter concerned two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the validity of certain rules of the Bar Council of Maharashtr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Seniority Dispute Between Direct Recruits and Promotees in District Judge Cadre; Examines Application of 40-Point Roster System under Maharashtra Judicial Services (Seniority) Rules 2007. The vexed issue of seniority between direct recruits and promotees once again engages the Court; the Writ Petition challenges the Final Approved Seniority List dated 11-09-2015.

25 Oct 2018

Background: The case pertains to a writ petition under Article 226 filed by fourteen judicial officers holding various posts in the subordinate judici...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers PIL on Infrastructure of Judiciary; Examines Primacy of High Court's Recommendations for Additional Courts. Court Notes State Government's Delays and Insistence That Its Own Views Prevail, Highlighting Need for 867 Additional Courts and Special Courts for Vulnerable Groups.

11 Oct 2018

This public interest litigation was instituted by a chartered accountant, Vihar Durve, raising concerns about the infrastructure of the judiciary in t...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)