Search Results for "KIADB acquisition"

149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010645132024_1

The present batch of writ appeals is directed against a common order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnatak...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Order and Clarifies Building Plan Sanctioning Authority in KIADB Industrial Areas. Government Order Issued Pursuant to Court Direction Confirms KIADB as Authority After Sale Deed Execution.

The petitioner, proprietor of Vishnu Hotel, constructed a hotel on a plot in Bommasandra Industrial Area allotted by the Karnataka Industrial Areas De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Miscellaneous First Appeals Filed by Acquiring Authority Against Enhanced Compensation Awarded by Reference Court in Land Acquisition Cases — Appeals Filed Under Section 54(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894

These miscellaneous first appeals were filed by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Builder's Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Partly Quashing Stop Construction Notice and Directing Objections Under KIAD Act. The Full Bench Reserves Judgment on 06-02-2014, but the Final Decision is Not Available in the Provided Incomplete Text.

The case involves writ appeals filed by M/s Century Central, a registered partnership firm, challenging the order dated 02/07/2013 passed by a learned...