Search Results for "Juvenile Justice Board"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Juvenile Justice Board"

201 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 201 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in POCSO Case Due to Flawed Age Determination by Juvenile Justice Board, Directs Fresh Determination. Board Failed to Conduct Mandatory Preliminary Assessment of Age Before Transferring Case to Children's Court, Violating Section 15 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.

11 Mar 2024

The dispute arose from a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and the Protection of Children f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Application for Juvenile Status Determination in Death Penalty Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Procedural Delays. Applicant Failed to Prove Juvenility Under Section 9(2) of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, with Discrepancies in Name and Age Documents and Belated Claim After Conviction Confirmation.

27 Mar 2023

The case involved an application under Section 9(2) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, filed by a convict sentenced ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Juvenile Delinquent Declaration in IPC Offences Case Under Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. Matriculation Certificate Conclusively Establishes Age Under Section 94, Overriding Alleged Discrepancies in School Admission Documents.

18 Nov 2021

The appeal arose from a criminal incident on 05.05.2020 where the accused, along with others, allegedly attacked the appellant and his family, resulti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal on Ground of Juvenility in Murder Case — Conviction Maintained but Sentence Set Aside. The appellant, convicted under Section 302 IPC, was found to be a juvenile on the date of the offence, and the sentence of life imprisonment was set aside with direction to forward the case to the Juvenile Justice Board.

7 Oct 2020

The appellant, Satya Deo @ Bhoorey, along with co-accused Keshav Ram and Ram Kuber, was convicted by the trial court under Section 302 read with Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Juvenile Board's Decision to Try Older Juvenile as Adult in Murder Case — Section 15 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 Requires Individualized Assessment of Physical and Mental Capacity to Commit Offence.

15 Jul 2019

The case involves two juveniles, aged 17.5 years and 16.5 years, accused of murdering a three-and-half-year-old child. The Juvenile Justice Board, aft...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Based on Consent and Promise of Marriage — Failure to Prove Ingredients of Rape Under Section 375 IPC. Evidence of Victim Contradictory and Medical Evidence Inconsistent with Prosecution Story.

4 Jun 2018

The applicant, Pravin @ Shrikrishna Chandrakant Marathe, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg, for offences under Sections 376, 4...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Special Court Order Refusing Transfer of POCSO Case to Juvenile Justice Board — Accused Held to Be Juvenile on Date of Offence Based on School Records. The court applied the principle of benefit of doubt in age determination under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, and directed transfer of the case to the Juvenile Justice Board.

23 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Siddu @ Siddeshwar, was accused in Special Case No.4/2015 under the POCSO Act before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bidar....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Special Court Order in POCSO Case — Accused's Age Determination Requires Proper Inquiry Under Juvenile Justice Act. The court held that the Special Judge must conduct a preliminary inquiry under Section 7A of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 read with Section 34 of the POCSO Act, 2012 to determine juvenility before proceeding with trial.

23 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Siddu @ Siddeshwar, was arraigned as an accused in Special Case No.4/2015 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Children's Court Finding on Juvenile Age Determination in Criminal Appeal — Ossification Test and School Records Considered. The court held that the ossification test indicating age 18-20 years and unreliable school records supported the finding that the appellant was about 18 years on the date of offence under Section 2(k) and (l) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.

6 Apr 2011

The appellant, Raju Pasla, was convicted by the trial court and filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court at Goa. During the appeal, he cla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Juvenile Offender in Murder Case — Life Sentence Set Aside Due to Juvenile Status. Petitioner Declared Juvenile Under Section 2(k) of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 on Date of Offence, Entitled to Benefit of Lesser Punishment Under Section 15 of the Act.

2 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Rahul Govind Sharma, was convicted for the murder of Siddheshwar Rai under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and sentenced t...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)