Search Results for "Intra-Court Appeal"

38 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 38 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's 2011 Pay Scale Order, Settles Long-Standing Litigation. Court Affirms Doctrine of Merger, Ensures Fair Compensation for Retired Employees, and Provides Finality to Pay Discrepancy Dispute

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a protracted litigation involving the State of Uttar Pradesh and its employees regarding the implementation of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Division Bench Order in Trade Mark Infringement Suit Due to Non-maintainable Intra-court Appeal. The Single Judge's Order Granting Time to File Affidavit-in-Opposition Was Not a 'Judgment' Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, Making the Appeal Inadmissible.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the appellant-defendants for infringement of the registered trade mark '...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Staff Selection Commission's Recruitment Process in Public Employment Case. Recruitment Notification Terms on Domicile Certificates and Post Preference Are Binding, with OBC Certificates Required to Be in Prescribed Format.

The dispute originated from a recruitment notification dated 03.12.2011 issued by the Staff Selection Commission for Constables in Central Armed Polic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order for Release of Secured Asset on Partial Payment Under SARFAESI Act. The court held that Section 13(8) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 requires full payment of dues for redemption, and partial payment does not entitle the borrower to reclaim the property.

The dispute arose between a bank, as secured creditor, and a borrower over the enforcement of security interest under the Securitisation and Reconstru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Urban Land Ceiling Repeal Case Based on Possession Taken Over. Vesting Under Section 11(3) of Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 Saved as Land Owner Voluntarily Surrendered Possession, Satisfying Section 3 of Repeal Act, 1999.

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and officials from the Department of Urban Land Ceiling, challenging o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case Over Bank Guarantee Validity - High Court's Direction to Substitute Bank Guarantee Set Aside as Appellant Complied with Original Order for Scheduled Bank Located in India Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from special leave petitions filed by SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation against Pow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Enforcement Dispute — Award Under 1940 Act Cannot Be Enforced Under 1996 Act. Contractor's Award for Road Construction Work Held Unenforceable as Arbitration Was Governed by Arbitration Act, 1940 and Award Was Not Made Rule of Court.

The appellant, M/s. Radhey Shyam Associates, a contractor, filed a Letters Patent Appeal challenging the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Execution Dispute — Award Under 1940 Act Cannot Be Enforced Under 1996 Act. Court holds that arbitration agreement entered into before 1996 Act came into force is governed by the 1940 Act, and award must be filed in court for enforcement under that Act.

The appellant, M/s. Radhey Shyam Associates, filed a Letters Patent Appeal challenging the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Caste Certificate Invalidation as Not Maintainable Before Division Bench. Preliminary objection upheld that matters under Act 23 of 2001 must be heard by Single Judge as per Chapter XVII Rule 18(3) of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.

The petitioner, Nilofarnaz w/o Nazkatkhan, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court ...