Search Results for "Insufficient Grounds"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Insufficient Grounds"

1177 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1177 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Failure to Prove Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Leads to Quashing of Complaint.

10 Feb 2026

The applicants, Chetan Sunderji Bhanushali, Pravin Girish Chamaria, and Ashapura Edifice Pvt. Ltd., filed two criminal applications under Section 482 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Arrest Illegal for Non-Compliance with Article 22(1) and Section 50 Cr.P.C. — Failure to Communicate Grounds of Arrest in Writing Renders Arrest and Subsequent Remand Void. The court held that the constitutional mandate under Article 22(1) requires grounds of arrest to be communicated in writing, and oral communication is insufficient, vitiating the arrest and all subsequent remand orders.

18 Jul 2024

The petitioner was arrested on 22 February 2024 in connection with C.R. No.68 of 2020 registered at Malad Police Station for offences under Sections 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Transaction Dispute — No Perversity or Wednesbury Unreasonableness Found. The Court held that a new argument not raised before the arbitrator or in Section 34 proceedings cannot be raised for the first time in a Section 37 appeal.

15 Apr 2024

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by SATCO Capital Markets Ltd. against Rahul H Bajaj....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Petitions in Nanded — Directs Payment of Enhanced Compensation with Interest. Landowners entitled to compensation under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for delay in payment after possession was taken.

2 Feb 2023

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the Nanded-Waghala Munic...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Quashing of Criminal Proceedings Under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. High Court Erred in Adopting Hypertechnical Approach to Complaint Averments Under Section 141, as Specific Allegations of Partner's Involvement in Firm Affairs Disclosed Prima Facie Case for Trial.

16 Sep 2022

The appeal arose from a criminal complaint filed under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by the appellant, a d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in BSF Disciplinary Case — Commandant's Power to Order Additional Record of Evidence Upheld. The Court held that the Commandant had jurisdiction to direct preparation of additional RoE under Rule 51 of BSF Rules, 1969, and that reasons for conviction need not be recorded by SSFC or appellate authority under Section 117(2) of BSF Act, 1968.

3 Dec 2021

The Union of India and officials of the Border Security Force appealed against a judgment of the Calcutta High Court which quashed disciplinary procee...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Communication of Documents — Violation of Section 8 MPDA Act. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu Was Not Supplied Copies of In-Camera Statements and Bail Order, Depriving Him of Right to Make Effective Representation.

28 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Omkar Chandrashekhar Kapare, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Link Between Bootlegging and Public Order. The court held that the detaining authority must consider the detenu's bail status and establish a clear nexus between the alleged activities and public order, which was absent in this case.

12 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Anil Preetam Kumbhar, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune on 6 April 2018 under the Maharashtra Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Insufficient Time Between Endorsement of In-Camera Statements and Issuance of Detention Order. The court held that the Detaining Authority did not have sufficient time to apply its mind properly, vitiating the detention order under Section 2(a)(iv-a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

10 Oct 2016

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Nilesh Dnyaneshwar Desale, challenged the detention order dated 16.3.2016 passed by the District Magistrate, Ja...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority Failed to Independently Consider Grounds, Leading to Mechanical Affirmation of Proposal.

25 Jun 2012

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Janardan @ Janyadada Chintaman Bhoir, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order date...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)