Search Results for "Insecticides Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Insecticides Act"

41 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 41 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Insecticides Act for Lack of Sanction — Prosecution Initiated Without Mandatory Consent Under Section 31(1) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 Is Void Ab Initio.

10 Dec 2024

The petitioner, B.S. Suresh Babu, proprietor of Karnataka Traders, filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Charge-Sheet in Insecticide Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Invalid Complaint. The court held that the complaint was not filed by a duly authorized Insecticide Inspector and no valid sanction was obtained under Section 31 of the Insecticide Act, 1968.

15 Oct 2025

The applicant, Tajraj s/o Yadorav Chavhan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of FIR No. 0244/2023...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Mosquito Repellants, Insect Killers, Cleaners, and Antiseptic Liquid Classified Under Respective Entries at 4% VAT Rate. Products like Mortein Mosquito Coil, Mat, Liquid Vaporizer, Mortein Insect Killer, Harpic, Lizol, and Dettol Antiseptic Liquid are held to be classifiable under specific entries of Kerala VAT Act, 2003, attracting 4% tax, not higher residuary rate.

10 Apr 2023

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which dismissed the assessee's appeal and upheld the Commissioner's classification ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Managing Director in Seeds Act Case — Lack of Vicarious Liability. Complaint under Section 6(a) read with Section 19(a) of Seeds Act, 1966 fails to disclose role of petitioner as Managing Director.

8 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Rafel Del Riyo, Managing Director of Syngenta India Limited, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Company Officials in Insecticide Act Case Due to Non-Joinder of Manufacturing Company and Expiry of Sample Shelf Life. The court held that without the company being arraigned as an accused, vicarious liability cannot be imposed on its officers, and the expiry of the sample's shelf life deprived the accused of their statutory right to get the sample tested from a third laboratory under Section 24(3) of the Insecticides Act, 1968.

22 Jan 2018

The petitioners, accused Nos. 2 and 3 in R.C.C. No. 479/2015 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Parbhani, filed a criminal writ petition un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Senior Manager in Insecticide Misbranding Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Applicant, a Senior Manager Production, not being a partner or director, cannot be held liable under Sections 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 without specific averments of his role in the alleged offence.

22 Nov 2017

The applicant, Jai Kumar Sedha, a Senior Manager Production at Biostadt India Limited, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Prosecution Against Manufacturer in Insecticides Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 24. Mandatory Thirty-Day Period for Analyst Report Not Followed, Rendering Prosecution Invalid.

14 Dec 2016

The applicant, M/s Kilpest India Limited, a company based in Bhopal, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Insecticide Misbranding Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Trial Procedures. Failure to Send Sample for Analysis to Central Insecticides Laboratory and Obtain Analyst Report Before Filing Complaint Renders Prosecution Invalid Under Insecticides Act, 1968.

6 Nov 2017

The petitioners, M/s Bayer Crop Science Ltd. and M/s Sai Agro Agencies, were aggrieved by the initiation of criminal proceedings against them in Regul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Insecticides Act Case Due to Delay in Filing Complaint Depriving Accused of Right to Second Sample Testing. The court held that the inordinate delay in filing the complaint under Sections 29(1)(a) and 18(1)(c) of the Insecticides Act, 1968, which deprived the accused of the right under Section 24(3) to have the second sample tested by the Central Insecticides Laboratory, warranted quashing of the proceedings.

10 Apr 2017

The applicants, M/s. Rallis India Limited and its factory manager, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

23 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)