Search Results for "Ineffective cross-examination"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Ineffective cross-examination"

20 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores Concurrent Findings of Fraud in Property Dispute Between Siblings — General Power of Attorney and Sale Deeds Set Aside as Void. The court held that the plaintiff had sufficiently proved fraud by preponderance of probabilities, and the High Court erred in reversing the concurrent findings without establishing perversity.

1 Jan 2020

The dispute arose between the plaintiff, Joginder Kaur (since deceased, represented by her daughter Nirmal Gill), and her step-brothers and step-siste...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Assault on Public Servant Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 353, 294, 506 IPC and Arms Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

14 Jun 2019

The appellant, Ranjitsingh Gulabsingh Chungade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in Sessions Trial 234/2002 for offences under Se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in NDPS Case: Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC After Conviction Is Impermissible. The power under Section 319 CrPC can be exercised only before the pronouncement of judgment; once the trial concludes and judgment is pronounced, the court becomes functus officio.

10 May 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had dismissed crimina...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Probabilised Defence. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Medical and Ocular Evidence Contradict Each Other and Defence of Accidental Injury is Probabilised.

10 Oct 2017

The appellant, Navalchand Motiram Jadhav, was convicted under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for attempting to murder his cousin brother ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Unsigned MOU for Flat Purchase. Contract Not Concluded as Essential Terms Were Not Finalized and MOU Remained Unsigned.

9 Jun 2015

The plaintiffs, Rohit A. Kapadia and Sandhya R. Kapadia, filed a suit against the defendant, Perviz J. Modi, seeking specific performance of an allege...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Arbitration Petitions Challenging Award on Family Settlement MOU — Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Interpretation of MOU Clauses but Sets Aside Award on Certain Claims as Beyond Scope of Reference.

6 May 2015

The judgment arises from two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a sole arbitrator's awa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Consent Terms. Consent Terms Recorded in Earlier Suit Are Binding and Cannot Be Reopened Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion Under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC.

9 Mar 2015

The appellant, Mrs. Geeta Patkar, filed First Appeal No. 18 of 2014 against the judgment and order of the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 55 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellant's Conviction for Murder of Parmanand Gaonkar Confirmed as Circumstantial Evidence, Including Motive and Last Seen Theory, Established Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

28 Oct 2014

The appellant, Jaisingh Dhondiram Karpe, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Parmanand Gaonkar and senten...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Property Dispute — Sale Deeds by Coparcener Without Legal Necessity Set Aside. Court holds that a coparcener cannot alienate joint family property without legal necessity or benefit to the estate, and that the burden of proof lies on the alienee to show necessity.

11 Nov 2013

The case involves two second appeals arising from Regular Civil Suit No. 232 of 1983 and Regular Civil Suit No. 74 of 1986, both filed by the appellan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Court held that no substantial question of law arose for interference under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

30 Nov -0001

The case is a second appeal arising from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents) against the origi...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)