Search Results for "Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946"

182 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 182 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bank Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding — Enquiry Found Fair and Findings Not Perverse. Part-I Award of Industrial Tribunal Confirmed as No Violation of Natural Justice or Principles of Evidence.

The petitioner, Chandrakant Shinde, an employee of Maharashtra Gramin Bank (a Regional Rural Bank established under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order of Workman for Alleged Violation of Certified Standing Orders. Petition Raises Question Whether Inter-Unit Transfer is Permissible Under Standing Order Clause 7 and Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

The petitioners, a Junior Section Officer employee (first petitioner) and a registered Trade Union (second petitioner), challenged an inter-unit trans...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petition Against Industrial Tribunal Award on Retirement Age in Industrial Disputes Act Cases. Employee of Amalgamated Company Seeks Retirement at 58 Years Despite Unit-Specific Standing Orders of 55 Years.

The petitioner, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, operated two independent industrial establishments: the Hosur Road unit and the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010408942020_1

The writ petition was filed by the management of a company engaged in the manufacture of industrial carbon and carbon brushes, classified as a hazardo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Whether Settlement Under Industrial Disputes Act Bars Modification of Standing Orders. Court Analyzes Interplay Between Industrial Disputes Act and Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

The dispute arose when the management of Hindalco Industries Ltd. challenged the modification of certified standing orders enhancing the retirement ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

The petitioner, Raymond UCO Denim Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULP Complaint No.27 of...