Search Results for "Inability to pay debts"

25 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding Up Order in Company Petition — No Grounds Made Out to Interfere with Company Judge's Discretion. The Court held that the winding up order was justified as the company was unable to pay its debts and it was just and equitable to wind up the company.

The judgment pertains to an appeal filed by Reminiscent India Television Ltd against an order dated 27 July 2010 passed by the learned Company Judge i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Company Winding Up Petition Under Companies Act, 1956 Due to Lack of Bona Fide Dispute. Concurrent Findings Upheld as Appellant's Defence Was Vague and Non-Specific in Reply to Statutory Notice Under Sections 433(e) and 434.

The dispute arose from a transaction where the respondent, a manufacturer of acrylic yarn, supplied material on credit to the appellant. The appellant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Varun Global Limited for Non-Payment of Loan Debt. Life Insurance Corporation of India Succeeds in Proving Company's Inability to Pay Debts Under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Company for Non-Payment of Debt. Debt of JPY 64,516,217 admitted by balance confirmation and part payment, no bona fide dispute raised under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956.

The Petitioner, Manjiro Works, a proprietory concern in the business of supplying gaming machines, filed a Company Petition under Sections 433(e) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up of S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. for Inability to Pay Debts. Multiple financial creditors and operational creditors successfully proved the company's insolvency under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns a batch of company petitions filed by various financial creditors and operational creditors seeking the winding up of S. Kumars ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Arbitration Petition and Winding Up Petition Against Corporate Debtor — No Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief or Insolvency as CDR Scheme Was Under Consideration and Debt Was Not Clearly Due.

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd., a non-banking financial company, granted a term loan of Rs. 50 crores to the first respondent, U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admits Winding Up Petition Against Syrma Technology Pvt. Ltd. for Non-Payment of Admitted Debt Despite Insurance Payment. Court holds that receipt of insurance proceeds does not extinguish the debt or bar winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Jiangsu Skyrun Wuxi Co. Ltd., filed a company petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Syrma Tec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Appeal in Debt Dispute — Company Deemed Unable to Pay Debts Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956. Debt Acknowledged by Respondent Company and Not Bona Fide Disputed, Entitling Appellant to Winding Up Order.

The Appellant, Tata Advanced Materials Ltd., filed a winding up petition against the Respondent, M/s. Tooltech Global Engineering Pvt. Ltd., under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petitions for Non-Compliance with Statutory Notice Under Section 434 of Companies Act, 1956. Statutory notice requirement under Section 434(1)(a) held mandatory and cannot be waived by agreement between parties.

The petitioner, Dolphin Investment Pvt. Ltd., filed two company petitions under Section 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking winding up ...