Search Results for "IPC 364A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "IPC 364A"

43 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction Under Section 364A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand for Ransom and Relied on Uncorroborated Extra-Judicial Confessions and Unreliable Dying Declaration.

10 Apr 2026

The case pertains to the kidnapping and murder of one Suresh Kumar, a financier, on 19.08.2015. The deceased was last seen on that day and his dead bo...

High Court

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction from Section 364A IPC to Section 363 IPC in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Insufficient Proof of Threat to Cause Death or Grievous Hurt. Long Incarceration Considered as Mitigating Factor for Sentence Reduction.

2 Sep 2024

The case pertains to the kidnapping of a 14-year-old boy, Harsh Sobti (PW-21), son of Dr. H.K. Sobti (PW-20), on 15.02.2000. The appellants were convi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeals in Kidnapping Case, Quashing Conviction Under Section 364A IPC but Sustaining Conviction Under Section 363 IPC. Kidnapping for Ransom Charge Fails Due to Insufficient Evidence of Threat or Conduct Creating Reasonable Apprehension Under Section 364A Indian Penal Code, 1860, While Simple Kidnapping Under Section 363 IPC Stands Proven.

21 Feb 2024

The Supreme Court heard two criminal appeals filed by accused persons challenging their conviction and life sentence under Section 364A read with Sect...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeals in Kidnapping and Attempted Murder Case by Setting Aside Conviction Under Section 364A IPC. Conviction for Attempt to Murder and Robbery Upheld as Prosecution Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt the Strangulation, Burning, and Looting of Victim, But Failed to Establish Ransom Demand Essential for Section 364A Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3 Jan 2024

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur dated 26.06.2018, which dismissed the criminal appeals of the a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction of Accused in Kidnapping Case from Section 364A to Section 363 IPC Due to Insufficient Evidence of Death Threat. The Court found that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredient of threat to cause death or hurt under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, leading to a reduction in the severity of the offence.

1 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by five accused persons whose convictions under Sections 148, 149, and 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for ki...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Non-Proving of Essential Ingredients. The Court held that Section 364A IPC requires proof of threat to cause death or hurt or conduct giving rise to reasonable apprehension, which was not established by the prosecution, leading to acquittal.

28 Jun 2021

The appeal arose from a criminal case where the accused was convicted under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for kidnapping a school stude...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case — Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Ransom Demand, and Recovery of Body. The court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and consistent only with the guilt of the accused under Sections 364A, 302, 120-B, 201 read with Section 34 IPC.

24 Apr 2020

The case pertains to the kidnapping and murder of an 8-year-old boy, Yug, son of Dr. Mukesh Chandak, a dentist in Nagpur. On 1st September 2014, Yug w...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Sections 120B and 364A IPC and Section 8(2) of Goa Children's Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove criminal conspiracy and demand of ransom beyond reasonable doubt.

7 Feb 2020

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by Uday @ Rupesh Falkar (A1) and Victor @ Duledonio Fernandes (A2) against their conviction by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Kidnappers for Ransom and Attempt to Murder in Minor Boy Abduction Case. Appellants convicted under Sections 363, 364A, 307, 120B IPC and Section 4 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 for kidnapping a minor for ransom and throwing him into a well.

31 Jan 2019

The case involves two appeals filed by Bhagwan Gajanan Phandat and Madhao Ravindra Kapade against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, K...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Extortion Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 364A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand for Ransom.

19 Jan 2018

The appellant, Lalit Vilasrao Thakare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge (V), Nagpur in Sessions Case No.78 of 2013 for offences punishab...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)