Search Results for "ILR 2007 KAR 2807"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "ILR 2007 KAR 2807"

5 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order on Stamp Duty in Specific Performance Suit. Agreement for Sale Recognized Prior Possession, Thus Stamp Duty Payable Under Article 5(e)(ii) of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, Not as Conveyance Under Article 5(e)(i).

11 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 23.06.2018 filed by respondent No.1 against the petitioner and other...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Refusal to Mark Agreement of Sale in Suit for Specific Performance — Stamp Duty and Penalty Must Be Adjudicated at Final Hearing, Not at Stage of Marking Document. The court held that under Section 33 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, a document insufficiently stamped must be impounded and sent to the Collector for adjudication, and cannot be rejected at the marking stage.

14 Feb 2019

The petitioner, plaintiff in O.S.No.29/2011 before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Udupi, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of s...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Order Requiring Stamp Duty and Penalty on Agreement of Sale. Court Holds That Existing Tenancy Possession Does Not Amount to Delivery of Possession Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and Stamp Duty Must be Assessed Under Article 5(e) of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1959, Not Article 20.

14 Feb 2019

The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 7.10.2009 filed by the plaintiff, who was a tenant in the suit pr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Trial Court Orders in Suit for Possession. Court upholds refusal to reject plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and appointment of commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC to identify suit property.

26 Aug 2014

The petitioners, S. Ramaiah, S. Siddappa, and S. Nanjappa, claimed to be owners of agricultural lands measuring 7 acres and 10 guntas in Nagarbhavi vi...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)