Search Results for "Hindustan Steel Ltd."

162 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 162 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Examining the scope of Industrial Court’s jurisdiction in unfair labor practice complaints under MRTU & PULP Act in the context of employer-employee relationships.

Acts and Sections Discussed: Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices (MRTU & PULP) Act, 1971 - Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Interlocutory Order in Domestic Enquiry — Holds That Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Invoked Against Every Interlocutory Order Passed by Enquiry Officer

The petitioner, Vinod Pattar, a workman employed by M/s. EIH Ltd. (the Oberoi Hotel), challenged an interlocutory order dated 21/12/2021 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Tribunal's Order Upheld for Lack of Substantial Question of Law. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for alleged concealment of income was deleted by the Tribunal on finding no deliberate concealment.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Holding Retrenchment as Unfair Labour Practice. Non-compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act renders retrenchment illegal and amounts to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Shekoba Auto Private Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in the manufacture of automobile ignition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Affirms That Employee of Government-Owned Company Not Holding Civil Post Under Union; Article 311 Protection Denied. Hindustan Steel Ltd.'s Independent Corporate Existence Precludes Characterisation of Its Posts as Civil Posts Under the Union Under Article 311 of Constitution.

The dispute arose from the termination of service of an Assistant Surgeon employed by Hindustan Steel Ltd., Ranchi. The appellant, S. L. Agarwal, chal...