Search Results for "Heritage precinct"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Heritage precinct"

20 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Statue Beautification Due to Non-Compliance with RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Acquisition Initiated Without Following Mandatory Preliminary Steps Under Sections 4 and 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Violating Article 300A of the Constitution.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Dr. Chandrashekhar Gattani, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of his land bearing Nazul Plot No. 41/1, admeasuring 660...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Demolition of Temple Structure at Vaidya Wadi. Court holds that the structure was not a protected monument and the petitioners lacked locus standi.

12 Dec 2023

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by four individuals claiming to be residents and devotees of a temple located at Vaidya Wadi, Mumbai. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Demolition of Temple and Construction of Commercial Complex. Petitioners Failed to Establish Temple as Protected Monument Under Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.

12 Dec 2023

The petitioners, residents of Vaidya Wadi, Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the demolition of a temple dedicated to Lord Hanuman...

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition by Real Estate Developer Against MCGM's Condition Requiring Heritage Committee NOC for Fort Redevelopment. Developer Challenges Condition 38 as Arbitrary and Discriminatory Under DCPR 2034 Regulation 52.

30 Aug 2023

The case involved a writ petition by a proprietary real estate developer, Shreeji Realty, challenging a condition imposed by the Brihanmumbai Municipa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in PIL Challenging Redevelopment Permissions in Heritage Precinct. Residents Allege Violation of Development Control Regulations and Arbitrary Administrative Actions by Municipal Authorities and Developer.

19 Oct 2018

The matter before the Bombay High Court was a Public Interest Litigation filed by four residents of Carmichael Road, Mumbai, including Normandie Coope...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates PIL and Writ Petitions on Hoarding Permissions on Airport Land. Petitioners Allege Non-Compliance with MMC Act, 1888 Sections 328 and 328A and CRZ Regulations.

1 Mar 2018

A public interest litigation and two writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the erection of hoardings by an advertising co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

5 May 2017

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

14 Mar 2014

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Development of Textile Mill Lands in Mumbai — Heritage Conservation and Public Interest Claims Rejected as Premature and Without Merit. The court held that no cause of action arises until a final decision is made by the Heritage Conservation Committee or other authorities.

5 May 2006

The Bombay High Court dismissed three notices of motion in a writ petition filed by the Indian National Trust for Art & Cultural Heritage (INTACH) and...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Violation of Natural Justice. Demolition Order Set Aside as Issued Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing, Despite Alleged Unauthorized Construction in Heritage Precinct.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Raul Aires Fernandes and John Aires Fernandes, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice dated 30 March 2016 issued by th...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)