Search Results for "Hawala"

46 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arrest Under PML Act — Validity of Arrest Under Section 19 PML Act Must Be Examined by Trial Court at Remand Stage

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) under Section 19 of the Prevention...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Hawala Operator in 2011 Mumbai Bomb Blasts Case. Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy and Funding Sufficient to Frame Charges Under MCOC Act and UAPA.

The appellant, Mr. Kawalnayan Wazirchand Pathreja, was accused no.3 in MCOC Special Case No.12 of 2011 arising from the 13 July 2011 Mumbai bomb blast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Placement of Vital Documents. Failure to Place Retraction Statements and Bail Orders Before Detaining Authority Renders Detention Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, son of the detenu Ramesh B. Doshi, challenged an order of preventive detention passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Publication of Name on Website of Beneficiary Dealers in Hawala Transactions Case. Input Tax Credit Claim Based on Bogus Invoices from Fictitious Vendors Justifies Revenue's Action Under MVAT Act.

The petitioner, M/s Timex Art Décor Pvt. Limited, a registered dealer in plywood and decorative laminates, filed Modvat returns for 2008-09 and 2009-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restricts Provisional Attachment to Disputed Amount in MVAT Act Case — Section 48(5) Constitutional Challenge Rejected. Court holds that attachment under Section 35 must be proportionate, and directs respondents to limit attachment to Rs.1.81 crores.

The petitioner, M/s. Premium Paper and Board Industries Ltd., a registered dealer under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Full Predeposit of Penalty in FEMA Case — No Undue Hardship or Prima Facie Case Established. Appellant failed to demonstrate financial hardship or strong case on merits for waiver of predeposit under Section 19(1) of FEMA, 1999.

The Appellant, Rajkumar Shivhare, was proceeded against for violation of Section 3(c) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) for allegedl...