Revocation of Probate Not Maintainable on Grounds of Title Dispute. Bombay High Court
17 Mar 2026The Bombay High Court held that a probate cannot be revoked on the ground that the testator lacked title to the bequeathed property. S...
Search Results for "Haryana Real Estate Rules, 2017"
32 result(s) found
Found 32 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Land Acquisition Appeals, Enhances Compensation for Dharuhera Village Acquisition. Land Losers Entitled to Rs. 1,49,14,975/- per Acre Based on Exemplary Sale Deeds Under Sections 4 and 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
3 Apr 2025The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of twenty-seven appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings in Haryana. Sixteen appeals pertained to acqui...
- 155
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.
10 Jan 2023The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...
- 237
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Wakf Board Notification Including Service Inam Lands in Dargah Property. Errata Notification Adding Lands to Wakf Property Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Wakf Act, 1995.
7 Feb 2022The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals challenging an order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court that upheld an Errata Notification issued b...
- 108
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.
18 Jan 2022The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...
- 258
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Estate Officer's Appeals in Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Dispute Under Consumer Protection Act. The court held that allottees paying conversion fee are consumers under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and the Estate Officer's refusal based on an internal memo without public notification was arbitrary under the Chandigarh Conversion of Residential Leasehold Land Tenure into Freehold Land Tenure Rules, 1996.
7 Sep 2021The dispute arose from the Estate Officer's refusal to convert leasehold residential plots in Chandigarh to freehold under the Chandigarh Conversion o...
- 186
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Estate Officer's Appeals in Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Cases Under Consumer Protection Act. The court held that conversion of leasehold to freehold property for a fee constitutes a service under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and refusal based on an internal memo without public notification is arbitrary, violating statutory rules.
7 Sep 2021The dispute arose from the Estate Officer's refusal to process applications for converting leasehold residential plots to freehold status under the Ch...
- 217
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.
1 Jan 2020The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...
- 365
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Rejects Recusal Plea in Land Acquisition Reference. Judge Who Decided Smaller Bench Can Sit in Larger Bench to Reconsider Same Issue as Bias Plea Based on Extrajudicial Factors.
23 Oct 2019This order arises from a reference to a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India concerning the interpretation of Section 24 of the...
- 198
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Varun Global Limited for Non-Payment of Loan Debt. Life Insurance Corporation of India Succeeds in Proving Company's Inability to Pay Debts Under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.
23 Dec 2016The petitioner, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...
- 140
