Search Results for "Gymnasium"

45 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 363 and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Barkya @ Vishwas Ananda Patil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Islampur, for the murder of a 12-year-old boy, Kuldeep, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by NGOs Challenging Revocation of Allotment of Gymnasium Centres by MCGM — No Right to Continue in Possession After Expiry of Licence Period

The Appellants, two NGOs, were allotted Gymnasium Centres by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) on caretaker basis for fixed periods. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by NGOs Challenging Revocation of Allotment of Municipal Gymnasium Centres. Court upholds MCGM's right to revoke allotment for non-compliance with terms and public interest, rejecting claims of legitimate expectation and violation of natural justice.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two appeals filed by NGOs, Samantawadi Mahila Vikas Foundation and Mumbaikar Peace and Welfare Society, challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not supported by medical evidence or eyewitnesses.

The appellant, Bhagwan Ramdas Tupe, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Vithabai Bajirao Patil by setting...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.

The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Electricity Tariff Categorization of Sports Complex as Commercial. Sports complex with nominal fees held to be recreation place under LTII(b) tariff, not LTVI.

The petitioner, Malabar Hills Citizens' Forum, a public charitable trust, runs a public park and sports complex known as Priyadarshini Park on land ow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging PF Liability for Gymnasium Centre. Fitness centre providing health services falls under 'Expert Service' category under Section 1(3)(b) of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

The petitioner, Fitness Point Healthcare Pvt Ltd, a company running a health care and gymnasium centre in Nashik, challenged an order passed by the Pr...