Search Results for "Guarantor's Liability"

194 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 194 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit Against Principal Borrower Despite Moratorium Against Guarantors Under IBC. The court permitted the plaintiff to proceed only against defendant no.1 (principal borrower) while reserving rights against guarantors under moratorium.

The plaintiff, IL & FS Financial Services Limited, filed a commercial summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to recover ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Initiation of CIRP Against Corporate Debtor Despite Payment by Guarantor's Resolution Applicant. Right of Subrogation Under Section 140 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Not Available Where Resolution Plan Extinguishes Guarantee and No Payment of Entire Debt.

The case involves an appeal against the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the 2nd respondent, Gujarat Hydrocarbon a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Guarantee Dispute — Guarantor's Liability Not Discharged by Family Settlement Without Bank's Consent. Family Settlement Between Guarantor and Principal Debtor Does Not Discharge Guarantor Under Section 134 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The petitioner, Narinder Pal Agarwal, was a director and guarantor of Narendra Metal Converters Pvt. Ltd., which had taken loans from Saraswat Coopera...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Guarantee and Pledge Against Company Pending Company Law Board Proceedings. Alleged Fraudulent Assumption of Liability by Directors Without Shareholder Consent Raises Serious Questions to be Tried.

The applicant, Rajinder Kumar Malhotra, filed an application in a pending company appeal seeking an interim injunction to restrain HDFC Bank from reco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petitions for Non-Compliance with Statutory Notice Under Section 434 of Companies Act, 1956. Statutory notice requirement under Section 434(1)(a) held mandatory and cannot be waived by agreement between parties.

The petitioner, Dolphin Investment Pvt. Ltd., filed two company petitions under Section 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking winding up ...