Search Results for "Grampanchayat member"

216 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Grampanchayats to Participate in APMC Elections as Nominees of Local Authorities Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Grampanchayat Held to Be a Local Authority Entitled to Nominate Members to APMC Under Section 11 of the Act.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by Grampanchayats (village councils) in Maharashtra challenging the rejection of their nomination form...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Grampanchayat Member Under Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Contract with Panchayat Completed Before Election but Payment Received After Election Attracts Disqualification.

The petitioner, Nandakumar Sharad Parab, contested and won the elections to the Grampanchayat Tulas held on 26 November 2012. He was subsequently elec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Mumbai Village Panchayat Act — Encroachment by Husband Not Ground for Disqualification of Member. Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Mumbai Village Panchayat Act, 1958 does not disqualify a member for encroachment by spouse on government property.

The petitioner, Sou Anita Hemantkumar Barawade, was elected as a member of Shigaon Grampanchayat in 2012 on a seat reserved for Scheduled Caste Woman ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Grampanchayat Member Under Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959. Appointment of Daughter-in-law as Peon Does Not Constitute Disqualification in Absence of Direct Interest.

The petitioner, Himmat Tulshiram Athavale, was an elected member and Up-Sarpancha of Grampanchayat Javala (Shahapur) in Amravati district. In 2015, he...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Due to Invalid Votes by Resigned Members. Resignation of Grampanchayat Members Takes Effect Immediately Under Section 35(3A) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, Rendering Their Participation in No-Confidence Motion Void.

The petitioner, Manjulabai Govind Dhumal, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kantekur, Taluka Omerga, District Osmanabad. The Grampanchayat consisted o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gram Panchayat Member Challenging Disqualification as Gram Rojgar Sevak. Post of Gram Rojgar Sevak under MGNREGA is not an office of profit under Section 14(1)(f) or (g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Santosh Jagannath Galbe, was an elected member of the Village Panchayat, Devegaon, Parbhani, and also worked as a Gram Rojgar Sevak un...