Search Results for "Gold Ornaments"

245 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 245 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Double Murder and Robbery Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Prompt Recovery of Stolen Property and Fingerprint Evidence Established Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 397, 450 IPC.

The case pertains to a brutal double murder and robbery that occurred on 21.08.2008 at Ichapuram, Andhra Pradesh. The complainant, Vetcha Kesava Rao (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 392, 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Anandrao @ Anil Baban Kharade and Vijay Hiraman Bahare, were convicted by the adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay at Sewre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery — State fails to prove guilt under Sections 395 and 397 IPC as witnesses could not identify accused and no stolen property recovered.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 16.02.2004 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kelapur, in Sessions Trial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Robbery in Auto Rickshaw Snatching Case — Identification by Informant and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 394 IPC.

The revision petitioner, Mansingh Dhonduram Sakpal, was convicted by the trial Magistrate for the offence punishable under Section 394 read with Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Double Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Complete and Accused Failed to Explain Incriminating Facts Under Section 313 CrPC.

The appellant, Rajesab Mujawar, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, North Goa, Panaji in Sessions Case No. 20/2008 for the murder of Shekappa Bhandar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Accused convicted under Sections 302 and 397 IPC for murder of aunt during robbery, with chain of circumstances establishing guilt.

The appellant, Ganesh Bhau Sonawane, was convicted by the Sessions Court at Sewree for the murder of his aunt, Laxmibai Narayankar, and for robbery of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Failure to Prove Chain of Circumstances Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302 and 394 IPC Set Aside Due to Lack of Motive, Last Seen Evidence, and Recovery of Articles.

The appellant, Pramil @ Premanand Rao, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder and r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Heirs' Challenge to Gold Seizure and Penalty Under Gold (Control) Act, 1968 — Upholds Tribunal's Finding of Possession of Primary Gold Without Permit. Burden of Proof on Possessor Not Discharged; Penalty of Rs. 5,000 Upheld as Within Statutory Limits.

The petitioners, heirs of late Ramratan Shrivallabh Chandak, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28th February 1986 passed by the Customs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal for Return of Stridhan Under Section 27 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Husband Liable for Ornaments and Articles. The court held that the husband is presumed to be in possession of the wife's stridhan and must return it unless he proves otherwise.

The appellant wife, Sangeeta B. Kadam, filed a Family Court Appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 11th June 2001 passed by the Family Court ...