Search Results for "Godrej & Boyce"

100 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 100 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Dividend Distribution Tax Rate. DDT under Section 115-O is a tax on the company, not on shareholders, and the India-UK DTAA does not provide a lower rate for DDT.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of seven appeals filed by Foseco India Ltd. under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging a comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Development Rights Certificate in Land Reservation Case. Held That Landowner Entitled to DRC for Entire Reserved Area Under Section 126(1)(c) of MRTP Act, 1966.

The appellants, Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and its constituted attorney, owned land bearing CTS No. 2B (part) and 3B in Mumbai, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Vesting of Land as Private Forest Under Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975. Defective Notice Under Section 35(3) and Notification Under Section 35(1) Render Vesting Invalid.

The petitioner, Rajmachi Rural Aid and Development Programme, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, filed a writ petition challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioners in DCR Interpretation Case Following Supreme Court's Godrej & Boyce Ruling. The Court Holds That Paragraph 6 of Appendix VII Entitles Owner to DRC Equal to Area of Constructed Amenity, Rejecting Circulars Limiting to 25%.

Background: The consolidated writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tribunal Order for Ignoring Binding Precedent in Section 14A Disallowance Case. Tribunal's refusal to follow earlier decision of the same court on identical issue held to be a jurisdictional error warranting interference under Article 226.

The petitioner, HDFC Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 23 September ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Record — Violation of Natural Justice. Mutation entries made without notice to the petitioner were quashed and matter remanded for fresh consideration after hearing.

The petitioner, Ozone Land Agro Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference, Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Determined Market Value Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Potential for Development, Rejecting Government's Valuation Method.

The case is a land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arising from the acquisition of land belonging to Godrej ...