Search Results for "Gharkul Scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Gharkul Scheme"

9 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Benefits Availed by Husband Under State Scheme Not a Contract with Panchayat. The court held that the Gharkul Scheme implemented through Block Development Officer does not constitute a contract with the Gram Panchayat, and thus the disqualification was invalid.

11 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Sau. Nandabai Ramesh Wakude, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Kenwad, Risod, Washim. She was disqualified by the Additional Collecto...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Benefit of Juvenile Justice Act — Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Accused Was 17 Years Old at Time of Offence and Entitled to Be Treated as Juvenile Under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.

9 Oct 2006

The appellant, Vijay Ramchandra Diwar, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, in Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Woman Panchayat Member for Lack of Toilet — Holds That Possession of Toilet Constructed by Husband Satisfies Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act. The court ruled that the disqualification provision must be strictly construed and that the petitioner's use of a toilet constructed by her husband met the legal requirement.

25 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Rukhminibai Badrinath Shedage, was a member and Up-Sarpanch of Village Gram Panchayat, Dhakalgaon, District Jalna. She was elected on ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Family Court Order Allowing Reopening of Evidence in Nullity of Marriage Petition — Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC Permits Recall/Re-examination at Any Stage Before Judgment to Prevent Failure of Justice.

29 Apr 2026

The petitioner-husband filed a petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking a decree of nullity of marriage against the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 323, 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

23 Sep 2019

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of five appellants under Sections 147, 148, 323, 302 read with 149 IPC for the murder of one per...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. The court held that the bar under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act does not apply when no prima facie case is made out, as the complainant was unaware of the accused's caste.

5 Mar 2019

The present appeal was filed by Kedarsingh Dharma Patil and Bablu @ Vinod Subhash Patil against the order of the Sessions Court rejecting their applic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under IPC and POCSO Act — Testimony of Child Victim Found Credible. The court held that minor inconsistencies in the victim's testimony do not discredit the prosecution case, and the conviction under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act was sustainable.

1 Sep 2017

The appellant, Ashok Yeshwant Gharat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, for offences under Section 376(2)(n) of the Indian Pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Sarpanch in Bombay Village Panchayat Act Case Due to Husband's Encroachment on Government Land. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

14 Jun 2011

The petitioner, Sau. Savitabai Sanjay Meshram, was elected as Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Ashtgaon in 2007 on a seat reserved for Scheduled Caste woman....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Orders of Teachers in Jalna District. Transfer orders issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Jalna, were upheld as valid and not violative of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, 24 teachers employed by the Zilla Parishad, Jalna, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)