Search Results for "Fraudulent Registration"

451 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 451 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking De-Registration of Cooperative Housing Society Registered 45 Years Ago. Court holds that post-registration events cannot be grounds for de-registration under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The case involves a rather unusual circumstance where the director of the Petitioner-company has sued himself in connection with proceedings for de-re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Statewide Integration of Building Plan Management System with MahaRERA to Prevent Fraudulent Real Estate Registrations. Court Emphasizes Need for Coordinated Verification of Commencement and Occupation Certificates Under RERA Act.

The petitioner, Sandeep Pandurang Patil, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IDBI Bank's Appeal in Winding Up Case — Revival of Winding Up Proceedings Set Aside and Sale Deed Directed to Be Executed. Agreement to Sell Not Fraudulent Preference Under Section 531 of Companies Act, 1956 as Executed Beyond Six-Month Period and Bona Fide.

The Supreme Court considered two appeals by IDBI Bank (erstwhile United Western Bank) against judgments of the Madras High Court relating to the windi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Amendment in Commercial IP Suit Due to Delay and Lack of Due Diligence. Amendment After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Plaintiffs Failed to Show They Could Not Have Raised the Matter Earlier.

The present Interim Application No. 752 of 2024 was filed by the original plaintiffs, Ramnish Verma and Finesse Fashions Pvt. Ltd., in a pending Comme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 7 Application for CIRP — Claimants Failed to Prove Debt and Default. The Tribunal held that the Appellants did not establish the existence of a financial debt or default, and the application was barred by limitation.

The present appeal was filed by Vistra ITCL (India) Limited, Pratiti Trading Private Limited, and Gajendra Investment Limited (Appellants) against the...