Search Results for "Fiza Developers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Fiza Developers"

15 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in MSMED Act Arbitration Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioner's alternative remedy by way of appeal was availed and withdrawn, and no grounds for review exist.

24 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a supplier under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act), had co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order Permitting Evidence in Arbitration Challenge. The Court held that the 2019 amendment to Section 34(2)(a) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 is clarificatory and limits evidence to the arbitral record, disallowing additional evidence in Section 34 proceedings except in exceptional circumstances.

19 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from an arbitral award dated 12.03.1998, which was challenged by the respondents through an application under Section 34 of the Arbi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Arbitration Act Case Regarding Foreign Award Enforcement. Non-Signatory Parties Not Bound by Arbitration Agreement Under Alter Ego Doctrine for Enforcement Under Part II of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals concerning the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards under Part II of the Arbitration and Conci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Arbitration Petition to District Court Nashik Under Section 42 of Arbitration Act — Prior Section 9 Petition Determines Exclusive Jurisdiction. The court held that the District Court at Nashik, having first entertained a Section 9 petition, has exclusive jurisdiction over all subsequent applications, including a Section 34 petition, despite a later Section 11 application before the High Court.

15 May 2020

The case involves a dispute between Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (the applicant/petitioner) and the Union of India (the respondent) arising from...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Additional Documents in Arbitration Petition Despite Delay, Subject to Costs — Charge-Sheet Filed Against Contractor Relevant to Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

22 Oct 2019

The judgment concerns two notices of motion filed in pending commercial arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Evidence in Section 34 Proceedings for Proving Grounds to Set Aside Arbitral Award. The Court held that while proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are summary, parties may adduce evidence by affidavit to prove grounds under Section 34(2), but no issues need be framed.

23 Sep 2019

The case involves an appeal against a High Court order that permitted respondents to adduce evidence in proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Paternal Grandmother in Guardianship Dispute Over Minor Child — Welfare of Child Paramount. Custody granted to paternal grandmother as maternal grandmother failed to prove her as a fit guardian under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.

15 Nov 2017

The case involves a dispute between the paternal grandmother (appellant) and the maternal grandmother (respondent) over the guardianship of a minor gi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Anti-Suit Injunction Application in International Arbitration Enforcement Dispute. Court holds that Indian courts cannot restrain enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in New York when the award debtor has submitted to the jurisdiction of the foreign court.

2 Feb 2015

The case involves a dispute between E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt. Ltd. (E-City), an Indian company part of the Essel Group, and Imax Corporation (IMAX...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Arbitral Award in Hire Purchase Dispute — Reduces Interest Rate from 36% to 24% per annum. Court holds that 36% per annum interest on delayed payments is penal and excessive, and reduces it to 24% per annum under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Jan 2015

The petitioners, Ashwin Crane & Construction and Ashwin Virji Dhame, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Applications Under Section 34(4) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Error in Trial Court's Discretion to Refuse Adjournment for Filing Objections. The court held that the trial court's refusal to adjourn proceedings to allow the petitioner to file objections to the arbitral award was within its discretion and not perverse, and no interference was warranted under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

6 Feb 2014

The petitioner, M/s. Udupi Power Corporation Limited, filed four writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging se...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)