Search Results for "Export Authorization Registration Certificate"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of ARE-1 Forms as Proof of Export Under Advance Authorisation Scheme. Court Holds That ARE-1 Forms Are Valid Proof of Export Under Paragraph 4.25 of Handbook of Procedures 2009-14 and Quashes Show Cause Notice.

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, challenged a Letter dated 1-12-2016 and a Show C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Exporters' Challenge to Rejection of Pomegranate Consignments Due to Pesticide Residue. Testing by NABL-Accredited Labs and Referral Lab Confirmed Chlorpyrifos Exceeding MRL, Leading to Denial of Phytosanitary Certificate.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by M/s Vitthal Agro Exports and M/s Krishi Vikas Exports, both exporters of pomegranates, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Export Authorization Registration Certificates in Cotton Export Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Registration Certificates Cancelled Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing, Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Foreign Trade Policy.

The petitioners, M/s. Euroflax Industries and Shri Anuj Mittal, were engaged in the export of raw cotton to Hong Kong and China. On 17 August 2010, th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seed Inspector's Entry and Seizure Without Authorization Under Seeds Act, 1966. Entry and seizure of seeds from storage area without prior authorization under Section 14 of Seeds Act, 1966 held illegal and without jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in the business of research, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Discriminatory Sales Tax Rules Under Article 226. Held that Rule 31B and Rule 31AA of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 operate in different contexts and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, M/s Graphite India Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MPCB Closure Order for Violation of Environmental Norms. Petitioner's failure to obtain valid consent to operate under Water and Air Acts justifies closure for operating without environmental clearance.

The petitioner, Green Gene Enviro Protection and Infrastructure Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Kerala Forest Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Statutory Interpretation. Sandalwood Oil Not Classified as Forest Produce Under Section 2(f), and Prosecution Failed to Prove Illicit Removal from Reserve Forest as Required Under Section 27(1)(d).

The appeal arose from a criminal conviction under the Kerala Forest Act, 1961, involving the appellant, a partner in a firm manufacturing and trading ...