Search Results for "Explosive substances"

89 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 89 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dr. Rajkumar Kidnapping Case — Evidence Lacks Credibility and Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Charges Under IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Coimbatore, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(1)(b) CrPC a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Senior Police Inspector in Mansukh Hiran Murder Case - No Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy Under UAP Act. Court held that mere meetings and use of benami SIM card without corroboration do not establish criminal conspiracy under Sections 16, 18, 20 of UAP Act, 1967.

The appellant, Sunil Dharma Mane, a Senior Inspector of Police, was arrested on 23 April 2021 in connection with the murder of Mansukh Hiran and relat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Atrocity Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Improper Investigation. Conviction under SC/ST Act and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove caste-based insult and arson beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Aba @ Munjaba s/o Rajabhau Giri, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Ambajogai, in Special Case No. 3 of 2013 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeal for Sentence Enhancement in NIA Case. Sentence of 8 Years Imprisonment for Offences Under Section 18 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Read With IPC Sections 120B, 121, 121A, 123 Held Adequate.

The State of Karnataka, through Cubbon Park Police, filed five criminal appeals under Section 377 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in TADA Case Due to Involuntary Confession and Lack of Corroboration. Confession recorded under Section 15 of TADA Act found not voluntary as guidelines in Kartar Singh were not followed, and confession of co-accused not admissible without joint trial.

The appellant, Raja @ Ayyappan, was convicted by the Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) for ...