Search Results for "Explosive Substances Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Explosive Substances Act"

57 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeal for Sentence Enhancement in NIA Case. Sentence of 8 Years Imprisonment for Offences Under Section 18 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Read With IPC Sections 120B, 121, 121A, 123 Held Adequate.

22 Mar 2021

The State of Karnataka, through Cubbon Park Police, filed five criminal appeals under Section 377 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal Under Section 30 of Employees' Compensation Act, Holding Both Employer and Manager Jointly Liable for Death of Worker in Explosion at Explosive Godown. The court set aside the Commissioner's award exonerating the employer and directed joint and several liability.

6 May 2026

The case involves an appeal under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, filed by the legal heirs of deceased Maroti Misal against the J...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dr. Rajkumar Kidnapping Case — Evidence Lacks Credibility and Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Charges Under IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

25 Feb 2026

The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Coimbatore, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(1)(b) CrPC a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in TADA Case Due to Involuntary Confession and Lack of Corroboration. Confession recorded under Section 15 of TADA Act found not voluntary as guidelines in Kartar Singh were not followed, and confession of co-accused not admissible without joint trial.

1 Apr 2020

The appellant, Raja @ Ayyappan, was convicted by the Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) for ...

High Court

High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Explosive Substances Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Intent to Cause Harm. The court held that mere recovery of explosives without proof of intent to cause harm does not justify denial of bail under Sections 3 and 5 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908.

2 Jul 2020

The petitioner, S. Chandramouli, accused No.1 in FIR No.107/2020 registered at Mandya Rural Police Station, filed a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NIA Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Irregularities — Conviction under Section 121 IPC and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Set Aside. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt as the evidence was insufficient and the alleged confessions were inadmissible.

23 Jun 2022

The case involves an appeal by Ghayur Ahmad Jamali and Aftab Alam @ Farooq (accused Nos. 3 and 4) against their conviction and sentence by the XLIX Ad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals of Accused in UAPA Terror Case, Upholding NIA Investigation and Rejecting Torture Allegations. Court holds that stringent bail conditions under Section 43D(5) of UAPA apply and that delay in raising torture claims without medical evidence is fatal.

22 Apr 2026

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals filed by accused persons (Rajendra Chaudhary and Dhan Singh in Appeal No.107/2026, and Manohar Narwaria and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused No.4 in UAP Act Case on Grounds of Parity and Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy. Petitioner-accused No.4, not named in FIR, granted bail as co-accused already released and no material showing his involvement in conspiracy under Sections 13, 16, 18, 20, 38 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

10 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Riyaz Ahamed Sayeedi, accused No.4, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder and Explosives Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Witness Inconsistencies. High Court's Reversal of Conviction Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302/34/120B IPC and Sections 3/4 Explosive Substances Act, 1908.

7 Jan 2022

The appeals were filed by the appellant informant, PW7 Rajesh Prasad, challenging the High Court of Judicature at Patna's judgment dated 5 August 2009...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case on Grounds of Faulty Identification and Doubtful Evidence. Court casts doubt on the validity of identification without a Test Identification Parade, delayed recovery of evidence, and the absence of specific motive for the accused.

30 Apr 2024

The Supreme Court of India acquitted the appellant due to insufficient and unreliable evidence regarding his identification and involvement in the cri...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)