Search Results for "Expansion/Diversification"

13 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Eviction Case Under UP Urban Buildings Act, 1972. Prescribed Authority's finding of bona fide need and comparative hardship under Section 21(1)(a) reinstated as Appellate Authority's reversal lacked sufficient reasoning.

The appeal arose from a landlord-tenant dispute over a cinema building in Allahabad. The appellant, successor-in-interest to Murlidhar Aggarwal, sough...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Reclassification of Mill Land as Non-NAINA Area Under DCPR 2034. Court upholds Monitoring Committee's decision that land not required for textile industry reverts to municipal reservation for public housing and amenity purposes.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Glider Buildcon Realtors Pvt Ltd and Mafatlal Industries Ltd challenging the decision of the Monitor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeal in Trade Tax Exemption Case Under U.P. Trade Tax Act. Exemption Denied as New Product Not Considered Different in Nature Under Diversification Scheme Under Section 4-A(5) of U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948.

The dispute arose from an appeal by a manufacturer against the denial of trade tax exemption under Section 4-A(5) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Challenge to Assessment Order Restricting Sales Tax Incentives under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993. Expansion Unit Seeks Quashing of Order Alleging It Is Without Jurisdiction and Contrary to Scheme Terms.

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of automobiles and spare parts, filed a writ petition befor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules Share Issue Expenses to Dilute Foreign Equity as Capital Expenditure Under Income Tax Act, 1961. Interest on Share Application Money Cannot Be Adjusted Against Such Capital Expenditure.

The case involves an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) at the ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...